Answer

Introduction

While poverty facilitates recruitment, the Maoist insurgency is primarily a crisis of legitimacy stemming from the systematic erosion of tribal rights. In Fifth Schedule areas, the failure to implement constitutional safeguards has created a “governance vacuum” that insurgents exploit as alternative justice providers.

Body

Governance Deficits and the Growth of Maoism

• Dilution of PESA: The Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act is often bypassed, with Gram Sabhas being ignored in land acquisition and mining projects.
  Eg: Chhattisgarh’s Hasdeo Aranya, tribal protests highlight how “informed consent” is frequently forged for corporate mining.
• Non-functional Advisory Councils: Tribes Advisory Councils (TACs), intended to advise Governors, have become defunct or dominated by executive overreach rather than tribal voices.
• Forest Rights Denial: Delayed recognition of Individual and Community Forest Rights (CFR) under the FRA 2006 leaves tribals vulnerable to eviction by the forest bureaucracy.
  Eg: Nearly 40% of FRA claims are rejected without transparent reasons, pushing marginalized youth toward extremist ideologies.
• Weak Judicial Reach: The absence of “Nyaya Panchayats” and the high cost of formal courts leave tribals without a mechanism to resolve local disputes fairly.
  Eg: The “Maoist Jan Adalats” gain traction precisely where the formal state judiciary fails to provide accessible, speedy justice.

Reforms to Strengthen Tribal Self-Governance

• Direct TAC Elections: Reforming the Tribes Advisory Councils to include directly elected tribal representatives rather than government nominees to ensure authentic representation.
• Gram Sabha Empowerment: Making the prior informed consent of Gram Sabhas mandatory and binding for all “Minor Forest Produce” (MFP) and land-use changes.
  Eg: The ‘Vandhan Vikas Kendras’ as a model where tribal cooperatives manage forest resources, reducing dependence on middlemen.
• Administrative Sensitization: Creating a dedicated cadre of civil servants trained in tribal languages and customary laws to bridge the trust deficit between state and citizen.
  Eg: “Tribal-centric policing” to ensure that security forces are seen as protectors rather than an external occupying force.
• Digital Land Records: Accelerating the digitization of land titles in forest fringes to provide legal security and prevent arbitrary dispossession by the state.
  Eg: The ‘SVAMITVA’ scheme, if implemented rigorously in tribal belts, can eliminate the primary source of Maoist mobilization—land insecurity.

Conclusion

Military success against LWE remains temporary without the “Emotional Integration” of tribal communities. Strengthening the Fifth Schedule is not merely a legal obligation but a strategic necessity. By restoring the “Gram Sabha” as a sovereign unit, India can replace the Maoist shadow state with a robust, democratic framework that honors tribal dignity and constitutional promises.

DOWNLOAD PDF