Core Demand of the Question
- Discuss the way in which the Pahalgam terror attack reflects both security challenges and strategic opportunities.
- Analyse the options for response across diplomatic, military, intelligence, and socio-economic dimensions.
- Provide a comprehensive strategy that balances deterrence with development
|
Answer
The Pahalgam terror attack (2025) targeting innocent civilians once again highlights the persistent cross-border terrorism and internal security threats in Jammu & Kashmir. While immediate security response is essential, the attack also calls for a multi-dimensional, long-term strategy that balances deterrence with inclusive development.
Security Challenges
- Persistent Cross-Border Terrorism: Terror groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed continue to operate from Pakistani soil.
- Local Recruitment & Radicalization: Use of social media platforms to radicalize and recruit local youth.
- Vulnerability of Soft Targets: Tourist spots and public gatherings remain vulnerable due to high civilian density and less robust security.
- Intelligence Gaps: Occasional failures in actionable intelligence sharing and inter-agency coordination.
For example: The Parliament Standing Committee on Home Affairs (2022) flagged lapses in real-time intelligence integration post major attacks.
- Border Security and Infiltration: Difficult terrain and porous borders enable infiltration of militants.
For example: The BSF has unearthed at least five underground tunnels in Jammu in front of the India-Pakistan border in the last three years.
Strategic Opportunities
- Strengthening Counter-Terror Frameworks: Upgrading surveillance, rapid response, and multi-agency task forces.
- Diplomatic Leverage for International Isolation of Terror Sponsors: Using evidence of cross-border terror to garner international support against Pakistan.
For example: Post-Pulwama, the UN blacklisted Masood Azhar as a global terrorist (2019).
- Regional Development Initiatives: Accelerating economic development and employment schemes in J&K to counter radicalization.
- Intelligence and Technology Modernization: Deploying advanced surveillance (drones, AI analytics) and real-time data sharing.
For example: The Centre launched “Drone Surveillance Grid” in border districts of J&K in 2024.
- Community Engagement and De-radicalization: Promoting civic participation, inter-faith dialogue, and education reforms to reduce alienation.
For example: Operation “Sadbhavana” by the Indian Army supports local education and healthcare in border villages.
Dimension |
India’s Response Options |
Example |
Diplomatic |
- Internationally isolate terror sponsors by presenting evidence at the UN and engaging FATF.
- Suspension of Bilateral Agreements: As a form of diplomatic pressure, India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty after the Pahalgam attack, signaling a serious downgrading of ties with Pakistan .
|
Pakistan was placed on the FATF grey list (2018-2022) due to international lobbying. |
Military |
- Conduct targeted cross-border operations against terror camps .
|
Surgical Strikes (2016) and Balakot airstrike (2019) showcased India’s military response capability. |
Intelligence |
- Improve coordination between national and state agencies (e.g., IB, RAW, J&K Police) using platforms like NATGRID.
|
In 2024, Drone Surveillance Grid operational in J&K.
Civic intelligence helped prevent several planned attacks (J&K Police Annual Report 2023). |
Socio-Economic |
- Accelerate development, job creation, and infrastructure projects in J&K (₹58,000 crore Prime Minister Development programme investment).
|
Government-run counter-narrative campaigns on social media. |
Comprehensive strategy that balances deterrence with development
- International Isolation of Terror Sponsors: India can leverage international platforms to expose and isolate nations supporting terrorism.
For example: Following the Pulwama attack in 2019, India successfully lobbied for the designation of Masood Azhar as a global terrorist by the UN Security Council.
- Strengthening Border Security: Enhancing surveillance and fortifying border infrastructure can prevent infiltration as per recommendations of Madhukar Gupta committee.
- Community Defense Initiatives: Reviving and empowering Village Defence Guards (VDGs) can bolster local security. These groups, comprising trained civilians, have historically played a role in countering militancy in remote areas of J&K.
- Infrastructure and Employment Programs: Accelerating development projects under initiatives like the Prime Minister’s Development Package can address economic disparities. Investments in infrastructure and job creation are vital for long-term peace.
- Educational and De-radicalization Efforts: Implementing programs that promote education and counter extremist narratives can prevent youth radicalization. The Indian Army’s Operation Sadbhavana, which focuses on goodwill and development in J&K, exemplifies such efforts.
- Countering Propaganda: Developing strategic communication campaigns to counter misinformation and extremist propaganda is essential. Highlighting success stories and positive developments can shift public perception.
India’s response must be firm but calibrated, combining strategic deterrence with developmental integration. A long-term solution lies in simultaneously ensuring zero-tolerance against terrorism and building inclusive peace through democratic participation, economic upliftment, and community trust-building in Kashmir.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
Latest Comments