Answer:

The term “Urban Naxalism” is broadly used to describe individuals in urban areas who support and promote Naxalite ideology through activism and advocacy, contrasting with active Naxals who engage in combat in jungles and extensive Maoist-controlled regions. This phenomenon has garnered significant attention in recent years, originating from anti-establishment protests and dissenters. The term underscores the expansion of Naxalite influence from rural regions to urban centres, raising concerns about national security and social stability.

Socio-Economic Factors Contributing to Urban Naxalism:

• Economic Inequality: Significant disparities in wealth and resources fuel discontent among marginalised communities.
  For Example: Slum dwellers in cities like Mumbai face stark contrasts in living standards compared to affluent neighbourhoods, breeding resentment.
• Unemployment: High unemployment rates in urban areas drive frustration and hopelessness.
  For Example: Unemployment in states like Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh, where Naxal influence is strong, exacerbates youth disillusionment.
• Lack of Education: Limited access to quality education perpetuates ignorance and leaves individuals vulnerable to extremist ideologies.
  For Example: Inadequate schooling facilities in urban slums of Delhi and Mumbai limit opportunities for upward mobility.
• Urban Poverty: Poor living conditions in slums and underdeveloped areas contribute to a sense of alienation and injustice.
  For Example: The Dharavi slum in Mumbai, one of Asia’s largest, epitomises the extreme poverty and overcrowding that may fuel Naxalite sympathies.
• Displacement and Migration: Forced displacement due to urban development projects and lack of proper rehabilitation support can lead to resentment and radicalization.
  For Example: Displacement caused by the construction of large infrastructure projects like metro rail networks in cities like Bengaluru and Hyderabad.
• Corruption: Pervasive corruption undermines trust in government institutions.
  For Example: Corruption scandals in urban housing schemes diminish faith in governmental efforts, making Naxalite alternatives appealing.
• Social Injustice: Perceived or real social injustices, such as discrimination and lack of representation, fuel anger and support for revolutionary movements.
• Political Disillusionment: Disillusionment with mainstream political parties and their failure to address grassroots issues drives individuals towards extremist ideologies.

Effectiveness of Current Government Strategies:

• Security Measures: Increased security operations and surveillance have been partially effective in curbing Naxal activities.
  For Example: Operations like “Green Hunt” have disrupted Naxalite networks but raised human rights concerns.
• Legislation: Laws like the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and the National Security Act (NSA) provide legal frameworks to combat Naxalism.
  For Example: The recent Maharashtra Special Public Security Act, 2024, empowers the state to label any group as illegal, targeting Urban Naxalism.
• Development Programs: Government initiatives like the Integrated Action Plan (IAP) aim to improve infrastructure and socio-economic conditions.
  For Example: Under IAP,  roads and schools are constructed in tribal and backward districts in LWE affected areas .
• Public Awareness: Efforts to educate the public about the dangers of Naxalism have had mixed success.
  For Example: Awareness campaigns in Andhra Pradesh have seen varied levels of community engagement.
• Rehabilitation Programs: Programs to rehabilitate surrendered Naxals aim to reintegrate them into the mainstream society.
  For Example: The “Surrender and Rehabilitation Policy” of central and state governments , though limited in reach, offers financial assistance and vocational training.
• Intelligence Sharing: Enhanced intelligence sharing among states has improved coordination in tackling Naxal threats.
  For Example: The establishment of the Multi-Agency Centre (MAC) under Intelligence Bureau(IB) for real-time intelligence sharing.
• Community Policing: Initiatives to build trust between police and communities aim to reduce Naxal influence.
  For Example: Community policing efforts in Kerala have shown promise in fostering better police-community relations.

Urban Naxalism poses a complex challenge, intertwined with socio-economic issues and internal security , necessitating a more holistic approach. Enhancing socio-economic development, ensuring fair and transparent governance, and fostering community engagement are crucial steps forward. By addressing the root causes and improving existing measures, India can better counter the spread of Naxalite ideology in urban areas, balancing security needs with civil liberties.

DOWNLOAD PDF