Answer

Introduction

The Union Ministry of Home Affairs’ directive mandating the recitation of all six stanzas of Vande Mataram revives a constitutional question seemingly settled since 1937 and reaffirmed in 1950. The controversy tests India’s commitment to secularism and the protection of individual conscience.

Body

Implications for Secularism

• Departure from 1937 Political Settlement: The 1937 Congress resolution limited the National Song to the first two stanzas, recognising objections to later verses.
• Contradiction of Constituent Assembly’s Choice: In 1950, only the two-stanza version was adopted as National Song; four devotional stanzas were excluded.
  Eg: Announcement by former President of India Shri Rajendra Prasad on January 24, 1950.
• Religious Content in Later Stanzas: Later verses invoke Goddesses Durga, Lakshmi, Saraswati, introducing explicit religious imagery.
• Article 51A Deliberate Omission: Fundamental Duties mention only National Anthem and Flag, not the National Song.
  Eg: 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 excluded Vande Mataram.
• No Statutory Protection: Unlike the Anthem, the Song is not protected under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971.

Implications for Individual Freedom

• Violation of Freedom of Conscience: Article 25 protects individuals from compelled religious observance.
• Right to Silence under Free Speech: Supreme Court recognised right not to sing even the National Anthem.
  Eg:  In Bijoe Emmanuel vs State of Kerala, students who stood respectfully but refused to sing the National Anthem were constitutionally protected.
• Judicial Protection of Respectful Dissent: Standing silently does not amount to disrespect.
  Eg: Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy in 1986 case held that “proper respect is shown by standing,” and that not joining in singing does not amount to disrespect.
• Executive Overreach: Directive issued without constitutional amendment or parliamentary law.
• Compelled Orthodoxy: State cannot prescribe nationalism in religious form.

Conclusion

A constitutional republic must reconcile patriotism with pluralism. Restoring the two-stanza practice, respecting judicial precedent, and avoiding executive overreach can preserve both national sentiment and individual conscience. Secularism survives not through compulsion, but through voluntary respect rooted in constitutional morality.

DOWNLOAD PDF