Answer

Non-state actors, including political groups, militias, and insurgent organizations, play a significant role in exacerbating ethnic violence in India by exploiting existing ethnic tensions for political or ideological gains. Recent instances, such as the communal riots in Manipur, highlight their influence. Strengthening governance and restoring the rule of law in conflict-affected areas requires robust legal frameworks, community engagement, and effective policing to curb violence and ensure justice.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Role of Non-State Actors in Exacerbating Ethnic Violence in India

• Engagement in Violent Activities: Non-state actors, often armed with looted weapons, fuel ethnic violence by engaging in violent acts, spreading fear, and further escalating the conflict.
  For example: In Manipur, non-state actors, armed with sophisticated weapons looted from state armouries, have carried out violent attacks, contributing to the spread of violence in regions like Jiribam, where ethnic conflict was previously unheard of.
• Disrupting Political Processes: These actors undermine the political stability by exercising control over local political processes, disrupting governance and hindering peace efforts.
  For example: In conflict zones like Manipur, armed groups often influence local elections and political decisions, making it difficult for the state government to enact effective policy measures.
• Creating Parallel Systems of Power: Non-state actors establish alternative power structures, eroding the state’s authority and legitimacy, further fueling division and hostility.
  For example: In conflict-prone areas of Northeast India, groups such as insurgent organizations act as de facto rulers, undermining state authority and exacerbating ethnic tensions.
• Exploiting Ethnic Divisions: Many non-state actors capitalize on existing ethnic and communal divisions to further their own agendas, deepening societal rifts.
  For example: Armed groups in Manipur and other regions exploit ethnic hostilities to expand their influence, turning local conflicts into larger, long-standing ethnic rivalries.
• Instigating and Escalating Conflict: By inciting violence and promoting a culture of impunity, non-state actors help perpetuate cycles of violence, making peaceful resolution harder.
  For instance: During ethnic clashes in Assam and Kashmir, insurgent groups have often provoked retaliatory violence, intensifying the ethnic divide and making negotiations more difficult.
• Undermining Trust in Law Enforcement: The presence of non-state actors undermines public confidence in the state’s law enforcement agencies, hindering efforts to restore peace and justice.
  For instance: In areas affected by insurgency, people often fear reporting crimes to authorities due to the presence of these groups, leading to a breakdown in the rule of law.

Measures to Strengthen Governance in Conflict-Affected Regions

• Enhancing State Capacity and Presence: Strengthening the state’s institutional capacity and expanding its presence in conflict zones ensures that governance structures are robust enough to respond to crises effectively. 
• Inclusive Political Dialogue: Governments should engage in inclusive, multi-party, and ethnic dialogues to address the root causes of conflict and foster trust among communities.
  For instance: In Jammu and Kashmir, initiating talks between the government, political leaders, and civil society groups can help bridge divides and create a path toward lasting peace.
• De-centralizing Power to Local Authorities: Decentralizing governance to empower local leaders and communities ensures that the political process is more responsive to regional grievances and needs.
  For example: Empowering local councils in insurgency-affected areas like Nagaland or Mizoram can help address ethnic tensions by allowing local leaders to play a central role in resolving conflicts.
• Strengthening Civil Society Organizations: Support for NGOs, community groups, and local activists helps build grassroots capacity to address local issues and mediate conflicts.
  For instance: NGOs in conflict zones like Manipur can play an essential role in providing humanitarian aid, peace-building efforts, and creating awareness among local populations about the need for cooperation and reconciliation.
• Promoting Economic Development: Economic empowerment through investment in infrastructure, education, and healthcare can help alleviate economic disparities, reducing the incentives for groups to engage in violence.
  For instance: In the Northeast, creating employment opportunities and improving infrastructure can deter youth from joining insurgent groups by providing them with better prospects.
• Promoting Media and Information Freedom: An independent media helps to highlight governance issues, keep officials accountable, and combat misinformation that fuels ethnic violence.
  For instance: In states like Assam, media outlets that report impartially and promote reconciliation can help diffuse ethnic tensions and counter propaganda from armed groups.

Measures to Restore the Rule of Law in Conflict-Affected Regions

• Strengthening Law Enforcement Agencies: Ensuring that police and security forces are well-trained, adequately equipped, and operate with full accountability is essential for maintaining law and order.
  For instance: Increasing the capacity and professionalism of police forces can help restore faith in law enforcement and deter violent groups from exploiting the situation.
• Ensuring Accountability for Violations: Holding individuals and groups accountable for violence and human rights violations is crucial for restoring trust in the justice system.
  For example: Prosecutions for violence and sexual assaults during ethnic clashes in Manipur can act as a deterrent to future atrocities and help victims seek justice.
• Establishing Special Courts for Conflict Areas: Setting up fast-track courts or special tribunals dedicated to handling cases related to ethnic violence can ensure swift justice and reduce delays in legal proceedings. 
• Establishing Peacekeeping and Monitoring Mechanisms: Neutral third-party monitoring by national or international bodies can help ensure compliance with ceasefire agreements and prevent further escalation of violence.
  For example: The presence of UN peacekeepers or other neutral organizations in conflict-prone areas can help maintain a fragile peace and monitor ongoing violence.
• Promoting Community-Based Justice: Encouraging local peace-building initiatives that involve both victims and perpetrators in dialogue and restorative justice processes can help heal communities.
  For example: The Truth and Reconciliation process in South Africa after apartheid can serve as a model for involving all affected communities in healing and rebuilding efforts in ethnic conflict areas.
• Addressing Grievances through Comprehensive Peace Agreements: Negotiating comprehensive peace agreements that address underlying issues such as land rights, political autonomy, and ethnic recognition is crucial for long-term peace.
  For example: The peace agreement between the Indian government and the Naga insurgent groups helped reduce ethnic tensions and led to a more stable governance structure in Nagaland

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Non-state actors play a significant role in intensifying ethnic violence in India by fueling divisions and exploiting social vulnerabilities. To address this, strengthening governance through transparent institutions, empowering local law enforcement, and fostering inter-community dialogue are essential. As Mahatma Gandhi said, “An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.” Promoting justice, peace, and trust will restore the rule of law and prevent further escalation.

DOWNLOAD PDF