Answer

Ethnic conflicts, such as the ongoing Manipur crisis, reflect deep-rooted historical grievances and socio-political divides. Political leadership and governance play a pivotal role in resolving such crises by ensuring justice, promoting inclusivity, and rebuilding trust. The Manipur strife underscores the need for sensitive, equitable, and sustained efforts, offering critical lessons for peace-building in diverse societies.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Role of Political Leadership and Governance

• Inclusivity in Leadership: Political leadership must prioritize inclusive governance, representing all communities to prevent alienation and address ethnic grievances effectively.
  For example: Inclusive cabinet representation in Tripura helped reduce tribal unrest through fair policies on land rights and cultural preservation.
• Conflict-Sensitive Policy-Making: Governance must focus on conflict-sensitive policies ensuring equitable resource distribution and addressing historical injustices fueling conflicts.
  For example: Nagaland’s peace process emphasised resource-sharing agreements between tribal groups, fostering reconciliation.
• Efficient Crisis Management: Political leadership should implement swift measures during crises, including communication channels and rehabilitation plans to prevent escalation.
  For example: The prompt deployment of relief camps in Assam’s ethnic violence of 2012 reduced long-term displacement effects.
• Strengthening Institutions: Governance must empower local institutional frameworks for mediation and conflict resolution to restore normalcy in conflict zones.
  For example: Autonomous District Councils in Northeast India have mitigated ethnic tensions through local dispute resolution mechanisms.
• Accountability and Transparency: Political leadership must maintain accountability by openly addressing administrative failures and involving citizens in decision-making.
  For example: Punjab’s leadership post-1984 emphasised transparent governance, aiding in rebuilding public trust.

Lessons from Prolonged Strife in the Region

• Fragility of Ethnic Cohesion: Ethnic divisions deepen when grievances are unaddressed, showing the need for constant dialogue among communities.
  For example: The failure to mediate tensions in Manipur post-May 2023 illustrates this point.
• Importance of Early Intervention: Delayed responses to violence allow strife to escalate, worsening humanitarian crises.
  For example: Timely intervention in the Gorkhaland protests prevented a large-scale ethnic conflict.
• Role of Perception Management: Overplaying achievements without addressing underlying issues leads to erosion of trust in governance.
  For example: The MHA’s self-congratulatory reports contrasted with recurring violence in Manipur undermined its credibility.
• Impact of External Influences: Refugee influxes and external borders require policies balancing security with humanitarian aid to prevent ethnic discord.
• Sustained Peace Efforts: Short-term peace measures without long-term reconciliation plans risk recurring violence.
  For example: Ceasefire agreements in Northeast India faltered due to a lack of socio-economic rehabilitation initiatives.

Rebuilding Trust Among Divided Communities

• Promoting Inter-Community Dialogue: Organized platforms for open discussions can address mutual grievances and build understanding.
  For example: Peace committees in Assam reduced mistrust between Bodos and non-Bodos through community-driven initiatives.
• Economic Integration: Joint economic projects among ethnic groups foster cooperation and reduce hostility.
  For example: Cross-community tea plantation projects in Meghalaya united Khasi and Garo workers.
• Cultural Recognition: Honoring diverse cultural identities ensures that communities feel respected and valued.
  For example: Recognizing Manipuri as a scheduled language fostered cultural pride in Manipur.
• Youth and Civil Society Involvement: Engaging youth leaders and civil groups can help bridge generational divides and promote reconciliation.
  For example: Youth forums in Nagaland actively reduced hostility among tribal factions through shared development projects.
• Trust in Governance: Transparent governance prioritizing justice for past wrongs and equitable development fosters faith in institutions.
  For example: Justice commissions addressing the Gujarat riots’ victims built institutional trust over time.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

A solution-oriented approach to the Manipur crisis demands inclusive political leadership prioritising equitable development, empathetic governance, and robust conflict resolution mechanisms. Building trust requires community-driven peacebuilding initiatives, transparent grievance redressal, and sustained inter-ethnic dialogues. Leveraging technology for accountability and implementing targeted welfare schemes can foster unity, ensuring a harmonious and resilient societal framework for the future.

DOWNLOAD PDF