Answer

In a landmark decision, the US formally withdrew from the World Health Organization (WHO), citing alleged mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic and accusations of bias toward certain nations. This withdrawal has created a financial void and disrupted global health strategies, opening avenues for India and the Global South to step up in shaping equitable health governance.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Interplay of Global Health Governance, Geopolitical Dynamics, and Financial Sustainability of International Organizations

• Shift in Global Health Leadership: The US withdrawal from WHO reduces its influence, creating space for emerging powers like China and the Global South to assert leadership.
  For example: China’s increased funding and leadership in WHO initiatives like the Belt and Road Healthcare Network exemplify its growing dominance in global health governance.
• Fragmented Leadership in Health Governance: Global health governance suffers from fragmentation, with WHO, GAVI, CEPI, and other organizations functioning independently without cohesive leadership.
  For example: The lack of coordinated responses during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted inefficiencies in governance.
• Geopolitical Rivalries in Health Policies: Geopolitical competition, especially between the U.S. and China, often affects the functioning of multilateral health institutions.
  For example: The U.S. withdrawal from WHO and China’s increased funding to WHO created an imbalance in institutional priorities.
• Financial Sustainability Concerns: The US contributed a significant portion of WHO’s funding; its withdrawal poses risks to program sustainability, especially in underfunded regions.
  For example: The WHO’s funding gap for neglected tropical diseases increased significantly after the US halted its contributions.
• Over-Reliance on Donor Funding: WHO and similar organizations are heavily dependent on contributions from a few countries, leading to financial instability.
  For example: The U.S. contributes approximately 20% of WHO’s budget, making its withdrawal in 2020 a critical financial challenge.
• Role of Philanthropies and Regional Players: Non-state actors like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and regional powers like the EU could offset funding gaps, shaping new partnerships.
  For example: The Gates Foundation pledged $1 billion for disease eradication programs to mitigate the financial impact of US withdrawal.

Impact on India’s Role in Global Health Leadership

• Enhanced Global South Leadership: India, as a key Global South player, can champion equitable health solutions, leveraging its experience in affordable healthcare innovations.
  For example: India’s COVID-19 vaccine diplomacy, through initiatives like Vaccine Maitri, supplied vaccines to over 100 countries, bolstering its leadership image.
• Opportunities to Strengthen WHO Programs: India can enhance its influence by funding and supporting WHO programs in neglected areas, positioning itself as a responsible global health leader.
  For example: India’s collaboration with WHO on its National Tuberculosis Elimination Program showcases its proactive role in health governance.
• Leveraging Expertise in Health Innovations: India’s expertise in frugal innovation, such as low-cost vaccine production, positions it to lead global efforts for affordable healthcare solutions.
  For example: The Serum Institute of India’s affordable COVID-19 vaccine production gained international recognition, reflecting India’s innovation potential.
• WHO Reforms Advocacy: India can push for reforms in WHO’s funding and decision-making to reflect the interests of the Global South, ensuring equitable healthcare policies.
• Collaborations with Private Organisation: India can partner with philanthropies like the Gates Foundation to bridge funding gaps and enhance its contributions to WHO initiatives.
  For example: India’s partnership with the Gates Foundation in improving maternal and child 

Challenges for the Global South’s Emerging Influence in Multilateral Institutions

• Funding Gaps in Global Health Programmes: The withdrawal of the US creates a significant funding shortfall for WHO, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries’ health initiatives.
  For example: WHO-funded programmes like India’s immunisation drive may face resource constraints, slowing vaccine coverage and disease eradication efforts.
• Dependence on External Funding: The Global South relies heavily on financial support from donor countries like US and EU and organizations like Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  For example: BMGF’s heavy involvement in India’s polio eradication programme raised concerns over external influence on health strategies.
• Geopolitical Competition and Fragmentation: The absence of a unified approach to health governance could weaken global responses to pandemics and other transnational health crises.
• Capacity Constraints: Many Global South nations lack the healthcare infrastructure and financial resources to independently tackle large-scale health crises.
• Loss of US-CDC Collaboration: The absence of the US-CDC’s expertise disrupts critical health surveillance and research collaborations in Global South countries.
  For example: The US-CDC’s partnership with India during COVID-19 contributed to effective genome sequencing and virus monitoring efforts.
• Limited Capacity for Independent Contributions: Many Global South nations lack the resources and expertise to fill the vacuum created by the US, limiting their ability to lead globally.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Opportunities for the Global South’s Emerging Influence in Multilateral Institutions

• Strengthening Regional Leadership: India and other Global South nations can step up to lead multilateral institutions, redefining their role in global health governance.
  For example: The India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) dialogue has been instrumental in coordinating health and development projects.
• Promoting Equitable Health Systems: The Global South can advocate for more equitable health frameworks that prioritize marginalized communities over donor-driven agendas.
  For example: India’s AYUSH initiative promotes traditional medicine in global forums, diversifying health solutions beyond Western models.
• Decentralization of Power: This presents an opportunity to diversify leadership within multilateral institutions, reducing reliance on traditional Western powers.
• Shaping a Multilateral Reform Agenda: The absence of US dominance creates room for Global South nations to push reforms for greater transparency and representation in WHO decisions.
  For example: India has called for a revision of WHO’s funding model to reduce dependency on voluntary contributions from wealthier nations.
• Funding Partnerships: South-South cooperation can promote pooling of resources for health programs.
  For example: India and South Africa advocated for the TRIPS waiver at the WTO to ensure affordable access to COVID-19 vaccines.

India’s global health leadership can thrive by fostering collaborative partnerships, investing in health diplomacy, and championing sustainable funding mechanisms for multilateral institutions. By leveraging its expertise and uniting the Global South, India can drive a resilient, inclusive, and equitable global health framework, ensuring preparedness for future health crises.

DOWNLOAD PDF