Answer

Introduction

Every society is built not just on institutions or policies but also on the perceptions its members hold about themselves and others. Among these members, children are the most impressionable. Children look at the world with wide‑open eyes, absorbing cues about power, identity, and possibility long before they can articulate them. Every greeting they witness, every story they hear, and every rule they follow silently teaches them who matters, what is normal, and where their own limits lie. If these early lessons celebrate diversity, nourish curiosity, and reward empathy, children grow up inclined to nurture a society that embodies these values. If, instead, the lessons emphasise hierarchy, conformity, and fear of difference, tomorrow’s citizens will unconsciously reproduce the very injustices that concerned their parents. This is why any serious effort to reshape society must begin with reshaping what children are taught to see. 

The quote, “To change society, first change how its children are taught to see it,” captures this transformational potential of education. If we aim to build inclusive, equitable, and forward-looking societies, the seeds must be sown in the classroom, in the playground, and in every interaction children have with the world around them. Education, in the broadest sense, is the workshop in which future social realities are quietly forged. It trains the moral imagination as surely as it trains the hand to write or the mind to calculate. When one changes the education of perception, one changes the trajectory of civilization. 

The Power of Early Perception

The first arena in which perception is shaped is the home and the early‑years classroom. Neuroscientists tell us that a child’s brain forms neural pathways fastest during the first eight years, making early experiences disproportionately powerful. If they are taught to see poverty as a personal failure rather than a structural issue, they may grow indifferent to inequality. If they are taught to view gender roles as biologically fixed, they may perpetuate patriarchal structures. Progressive early‑childhood programmes counter this by modelling inclusive language, diverse play materials, and collaborative activities that reward kindness over competition. A four‑year‑old who collaborates with classmates on building a cardboard city, or who sees storybooks featuring protagonists of many skin tones, absorbs lessons of equity without a single sermon. Such subtle shifts in early perception create adults who instinctively resist prejudice and recognise shared humanity. 

Curriculum as a Mirror of Society

The school curriculum plays a powerful role in shaping children’s worldview. It is not merely a collection of academic subjects, it is a moral and ideological framework that signals what a society values. A curriculum that prioritizes rote memorization over critical thinking may produce obedient workers but not thoughtful citizens. One that excludes the histories of marginalized communities reinforces dominant narratives and silences alternative voices. However, when they weave multiple perspectives into the narrative, they nurture critical patriotism. A science syllabus that encourages students to design low‑cost water filters for village ponds teaches them that knowledge must serve societal need, whereas rote memorization of definitions trains them only to chase grades. Mahatma Gandhi’s Nai Talim emphasized self-reliance, community service, and productive learning. In contemporary times, the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 stresses experiential learning, ethical development, and promotion of constitutional ideals.  

Around the world, school systems that emphasise project‑based inquiry. From Finland’s phenomenon‑based learning to Kenya’s competence‑based curriculum, it consistently produces young citizens who question received wisdom and propose creative solutions. Conversely, systems that judge worth solely by standardised marks tend to stifle dissent and reward blind obedience, ultimately weakening a society’s capacity for self‑correction.

Teachers as Catalysts of Change

No curriculum, however enlightened, can come alive without teachers who embody its spirit.Teachers are often the most immediate and influential interpreters of the social world for children. Beyond textbooks, it is their words, attitudes, and behaviors that guide how students make sense of society. When teachers invite questions, admit uncertainty, and model respectful disagreement, they license children to explore ideas fearlessly. Where teachers are underpaid, undertrained, or shackled by authoritarian management, they often default to moralistic monologue and punitive discipline, transmitting the message that power silences inquiry. Therefore, countries that invest heavily in teacher training, granting autonomy, mentoring and prestige, find that classroom culture rapidly shifts from coercive to collaborative. Savitribai Phule, who taught Dalit and girl students against social norms, exemplify how teaching can itself be an act of revolution. 

Structural Equity and Access to Opportunity

While reforming curriculum and pedagogy is essential, it must be accompanied by efforts to ensure equitable access to quality education. Around the globe, elite private schools boast smart classrooms and low student‑teacher ratios, while public schools in marginalised neighbourhoods struggle for toilets and chalk. Such disparity and segregation denies children the chance to engage with diversity and reinforces echo chambers. Children in underprivileged schools often internalize the belief that they are less capable or deserving, while those in privileged ones may grow up with a distorted sense of meritocracy.

A society genuinely committed to transformation must therefore treat equal educational access not as charity but as justice. Policies reserving seats for disadvantaged groups, free midday meals that keep the poorest in class, and community‑run bridge schools for migrant children are indispensable correctives. When a farmer’s daughter in a rural Indian district and a banker’s son in Singapore both access laboratories, libraries, and arts studios, the circle of aspiration expands, and society’s talent pool deepens.

Beyond access, the question of safety and emotional well-being is central. Children who face bullying, discrimination, or violence at school will not only struggle academically but also carry distorted images of society into adulthood. School should be a safe space where children are taught that difference is not deficiency and where dignity is non-negotiable.

Representation within learning materials further refines how children map the social world. If every scientist in a textbook illustration is male, and every sanitation worker belongs to a minority community, stereotypes harden unquestioned. By consciously including biographies of women coders, Dalit poets, Indigenous environmentalists, and disabled athletes, educators normalise plurality and signal that brilliance wears many faces. The impact is tangible. Studies in the United States show that girls exposed to female STEM role models in middle school are significantly likelier to choose physics in high school. Similarly, when Indian language handbooks began featuring tribal folklore, attendance among tribal students rose, revealing how recognition fosters belonging.

The Influence of Media and Digital Literacy

In the 21st century, the classroom is no longer the sole or even the primary space where children learn about society.  Teenagers today may spend more waking hours on smartphones than in school, absorbing values from influencers, viral memes, and algorithm‑curated videos. Left unexamined, these digital narratives reinforce consumerism, unrealistic body standards, and ideological bubbles. 

Thus, media literacy and digital literacy programmes are no longer optional. Children must be taught to question sources, understand bias, identify misinformation, and reflect on the values embedded in media messages. Just as we teach grammar or math, we must teach children how to decode the digital world and create their own civic content to convert the internet into a laboratory of cross‑cultural collaboration. A Brazilian adolescent producing a climate‑justice podcast, or a Syrian refugee teenager coding an educational app, demonstrates how empowered media use can amplify voices historically muted.

Central to the project of societal renewal is a shift from obedience‑based pedagogy to agency‑oriented learning. Traditional systems reward the correct answer, transformative systems reward the good question. Debate clubs, student parliaments, service‑learning projects, and restorative‑justice circles train adolescents to deliberate, empathise, and take responsibility for communal outcomes. In Rwanda, post‑genocide peace education uses interactive classroom techniques to dismantle ethnic mistrust. In Germany, Holocaust remembrance projects task students with interviewing survivors, turning history into moral commitment. Such practices cultivate citizens who see themselves not as spectators of governance but as its stewards.

Reimagining the purpose of education ultimately requires balancing economic goals with ethical imperatives. Parents naturally hope schooling leads to stable livelihoods, yet societies implode when moral vacuums accompany material success. Values education can be embedded through interdisciplinary projects on waste management, civic hacking, or inclusive theatre, demonstrating that personal advancement and public good are intertwined. A start‑up incubator that pairs business mentoring with courses on sustainable development, or a medical college that embeds rotations in underserved clinics, signals to students that excellence is inseparable from social responsibility.

Beyond Schools: A Collective Responsibility

While schools play a critical role, changing how children are taught to see society is a much broader project. It requires families, media creators, religious institutions, policymakers, and civil society to participate in building an environment that affirms democratic, inclusive, and humane values. 

This means more inclusive children’s literature, diverse role models in films, fair representation in political discourse, and community projects that foster empathy. When children visit a museum that honors tribal art, hear a political leader speaking up for trans- rights, they internalize a broader vision of humanity. 

The state also has a responsibility. It must protect children’s right to education, free expression, safety, and dignity. Policies that criminalize child labor, regulate hate speech, or promote inclusive education are not just governance tools, they are moral commitments to shaping a better society. Conversely, when the state promotes exclusionary ideologies, censors dissent, or curtails academic freedom, it distorts the vision children have of the world and their place in it. 

At the core of this transformation is the belief that children are not passive recipients of knowledge. They are active meaning-makers. When equipped with the right tools, support systems, and exposure, they can challenge stereotypes, ask difficult questions, and imagine alternatives. From Malala Yousafzai to Greta Thunberg, young people around the world have shown that age is no barrier to insight, courage, or impact. 

Conclusion

Changing how children are taught to see society is not a matter of idealism,it is a strategic and ethical imperative. Every stereotype dismantled in a picture book, every question encouraged in a science lab, every friendship across caste or colour forged on a playground, chips away at future injustice. And when we do so at scale, society itself begins to change, not just in how it appears, but in how it behaves. When children learn to spot propaganda, empathise with strangers, and imagine alternatives, they carry those capacities into boardrooms, parliaments, and neighbourhood councils.  

As Neil Postman rightly said, “Children are the living messages we send to a time we will not see. Education that expands vision therefore becomes the most enduring form of social engineering, gentle in method yet radical in outcome. Societies that grasp this invest not only in new buildings and syllabi but in the invisible architecture of perception, ensuring that tomorrow’s citizens inherit not just a changed world, but the insight and will to keep changing it for the better.       

DOWNLOAD PDF