Answer:

Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Mahatma Gandhi were towering figures in India’s freedom struggle, each leaving an indelible mark on the movement. Tilak, known as the “Father of Indian Unrest,” and Gandhi, revered as the “Father of the Nation,” had different approaches but shared the common goal of achieving independence for India.

Pivotal Figures in India’s Freedom Struggle:

• Advocacy for Swaraj and Non-Cooperation: 
  • Bal Gangadhar Tilak: Tilak popularised the demand for Swaraj (self-rule) with his assertion, “Swaraj is my birthright, and I shall have it,” which mobilised masses and laid the foundation for future movements.
    For example: His leadership during the Home Rule Movement in 1916 garnered widespread support across India.
  • Mahatma Gandhi: Gandhi’s Non-Cooperation Movement in 1920 called for the boycott of British goods and institutions, marking the first mass movement.
    For instance: The movement saw unprecedented participation from all sections of society, making it a nationwide struggle.
• Role as Social Reformers:
  • Bal Gangadhar Tilak: Tilak promoted nationalist education by co-founding institutions like Fergusson College and Deccan Education Society.
    For example: These institutions nurtured future leaders of the independence movement.
  • Mahatma Gandhi: Gandhi campaigned against untouchability and promoted social equality, integral to his vision of a free India.
    For example: The Harijan Sevak Sangh (1932), founded by Gandhi, worked towards uplifting marginalised sections of society.
• Use of Journalism to Inspire Nationalism:
  • Bal Gangadhar Tilak: Through his newspapers Kesari and Mahratta, Tilak criticised British policies and inspired nationalist sentiments.
    For example: His articles during the plague epidemic in Pune led to his imprisonment, which increased his popularity among the masses.
  • Mahatma Gandhi: Gandhi used journalism to promote his ideas and rally support for the independence movement.
    For example: His publication, Young India, played a crucial role in disseminating his philosophy and mobilising the masses.
• Leadership in Mass Movements
  • Bal Gangadhar Tilak: Tilak’s assertive leadership and call for Swaraj galvanised the masses and set the stage for future national campaigns.
    For example: The Home Rule Movement mobilised widespread support and laid a foundation for the struggle for independence.
  • Mahatma Gandhi: Gandhi’s leadership in the Non-Cooperation Movement turned the struggle for independence into a mass movement with participation from all sections of society.
    For example: The nationwide scope of the Non-Cooperation Movement marked a significant step towards complete independence.
• Impact on Future Generations:
  • Bal Gangadhar Tilak: Tilak’s advocacy for education and social reform inspired future leaders and provided a blueprint for nationalist activities.
    For example: Institutions like Fergusson College continued to produce influential leaders in the independence movement.
  • Mahatma Gandhi: Gandhi’s social reforms and non-violent methods influenced future generations and set the tone for civil rights movements globally.
    For example: His campaigns against social injustices and promotion of non-violence inspired global leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela.

Similarities between Tilak and Gandhi:

• Nationalist Vision:
  • Common Goal of Independence: Both Tilak and Gandhi envisioned an independent India free from British rule.
    For example: Both leaders used their platforms—Tilak through his newspapers and Gandhi through his speeches—to propagate the idea of Swaraj.
• Mass Mobilization:
  • Engaging the Masses: Both leaders believed in involving the common people in the freedom struggle.
    For example: Tilak’s Ganapati festivals and Shivaji celebrations mobilised masses, similar to Gandhi’s use of the Salt March (1930).
• Educational Reforms:
  • Focus on Education: Both Tilak and Gandhi emphasised the need for education rooted in Indian culture.
    For example: Tilak’s efforts in founding educational institutions and Gandhi’s Nai Talim promoted practical skills alongside academic knowledge.
• Use of Religion:
  • Incorporating Religious Symbols: Both leaders used religious symbols to unite people.
    For example: Tilak invoked Maratha pride and Hindu festivals, while Gandhi used the concept of ‘Ram Rajya’ to appeal to the masses.
• Grassroots Connection:
  • Connection with Rural India: Both leaders had strong ties with rural India and understood the importance of the rural populace in the freedom struggle.
    For example: Tilak’s campaigns reached remote areas, similar to Gandhi’s tours across villages to understand and address rural issues.
• Reformist Approach:
  • Social Reforms: Both advocated for social reforms alongside political freedom.
    For example: Tilak’s fight against age of consent laws (as he believed political freedom should precede social reforms) and Gandhi’s campaign against untouchability.
• Public Communication:
  • Effective Communicators: Both were adept at communicating their ideas to the masses.
  • Example: Tilak’s fiery speeches and editorials and Gandhi’s mass prayers and speeches were instrumental in spreading their messages.

Differences between Tilak and Gandhi:

• Approach to Violence:
  • Tilak’s Support for Passive Resistance: Tilak supported passive resistance but did not oppose violence outright.
    For example: He defended the actions of revolutionaries like Khudiram Bose.
  • Gandhi’s Strict Non-Violence: Gandhi was a staunch advocate of non-violence (Ahimsa).
    For example: He called off the Non-Cooperation Movement after the Chauri Chaura incident (1922) due to violence.
• View on British Rule:
  • Tilak’s Immediate Swaraj: Tilak demanded immediate self-rule and was more confrontational.
    For instance: His opposition to the Moderates in Congress.
  • Gandhi’s Gradual Approach: Gandhi believed in negotiating with the British and achieving independence gradually.
    For example: His initial support for the British during World War I in the hope of gaining concessions.
• Economic Views:
  • Tilak’s Economic Nationalism: Tilak promoted Swadeshi and economic self-reliance.
    For example: His advocacy for boycotting British goods.
  • Gandhi’s Village Economy: Gandhi emphasised the importance of village industries and self-sufficient communities.
    For example: His promotion of Khadi and rural handicrafts.
• Social Reforms:
  • Tilak’s Prioritization of Swaraj: Tilak believed political freedom should precede social reforms.
    For example: His opposition to the Age of Consent Act.
  • Gandhi’s Integrated Approach: Gandhi saw social reforms as integral to the freedom struggle.
    For example: His campaigns against untouchability and for women’s rights.
• Relation with British Authorities:
  • Tilak’s Confrontational Stance: Tilak was often at odds with British authorities and faced multiple imprisonments.
    For example: Bal Gangadhar Tilak was the first person to be convicted of sedition in colonial India (1908).
  • Gandhi’s Negotiation: Gandhi engaged in dialogues and negotiations with the British.
    For example: The Round Table Conferences and his letters to the Viceroy.
• Political Alliances:
  • Tilak’s Alliances with Extremists: Tilak was aligned with the extremist faction of the Congress.
    For example: His partnership with Lala Lajpat Rai and Bipin Chandra Pal.
  • Gandhi’s Inclusive Leadership: Gandhi aimed to unify all factions within the Congress.
    For example: His efforts to reconcile differences between Moderates and Extremists.
• Cultural Symbolism:
  • Tilak’s Emphasis on Hindu Identity: Tilak often used Hindu symbols and festivals.
    For example: The Ganapati and Shivaji festivals.
  • Gandhi’s Universal Appeal: Gandhi used broader cultural symbols to appeal to all Indians.
    For example: The spinning wheel (Charkha) as a symbol of self-reliance and unity.

Impact of Bal Gangadhar Tilak on the Indian Independence Movement:

• Swaraj Movement: Tilak’s assertion that “Swaraj is my birthright” inspired a generation of freedom fighters.
  For example: His leadership during the Home Rule Movement energised the national movement for independence.
• Educational Initiatives: Tilak founded institutions like Fergusson College to instil nationalist values.
  For example: These institutions produced many leaders who played pivotal roles in the independence movement.
• Journalism: Through his newspapers Kesari and Mahratta, Tilak spread nationalist ideas.
  For example: His writings during the plague epidemic in Pune criticised British policies, leading to his imprisonment and increased popularity.
• Religious and Cultural Mobilization: Tilak used festivals like Ganapati and Shivaji celebrations to unite people.
  For example: These festivals became platforms for political mobilisation and spreading nationalist sentiments.
• Political Strategy: Tilak’s leadership in the extremist faction of Congress pushed for more aggressive actions against British rule.
  For example: The Surat Split of 1907, which emphasised the need for direct action and passive resistance.

Impact of Mahatma Gandhi on the Indian Independence Movement:

• Non-Violent Resistance: Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence became the cornerstone of the freedom struggle.
  For example: The success of the Salt March demonstrated the power of nonviolent protest.
• Mass Mobilization: Gandhi’s ability to mobilise millions from all sections of society was unparalleled.
  For example: The Quit India Movement saw mass participation from every corner of India.
• Social Reforms: Gandhi’s campaigns against untouchability aimed to integrate marginalised communities.
  For example: The establishment of Harijan Sevak Sangh to promote social equality.
• Economic Self-Reliance: Gandhi’s emphasis on spinning Khadi encouraged self-reliance and economic independence.
  For example: The widespread adoption of Khadi became a symbol of resistance against British goods.
• Political Leadership: Gandhi’s leadership in the Indian National Congress unified various factions and directed the freedom struggle.
  For example: His role in the Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience movements galvanised the nation.

Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Mahatma Gandhi, despite their differing approaches, significantly contributed to India’s freedom struggle. Tilak’s assertive nationalism and Gandhi’s non-violent resistance complemented each other in mobilising the masses and challenging British rule. Their legacy continues to inspire contemporary movements for justice and self-reliance, reminding us of the enduring power of dedication and leadership in the quest for freedom.

DOWNLOAD PDF