The politics of planned development has played a pivotal role in shaping the socio-economic landscape of nations. This multifaceted concept involves deliberate formulation and execution of strategies by governments to achieve specific economic and social objectives. Central to this endeavor is allocation of resources, pursuit of equitable growth, and enhancement of the overall well-being of citizens. As governments grapple with diverse interests, ideologies, and global dynamics, politics of planned development becomes a critical arena where policies are debated, decisions are made, and a vision for a nation’s future takes shape.

Political Contestation

Complexity of Developmental Politics: In a democracy, the major decisions of development politics tend to be complex and involve balancing of interests with various social groups and generations.

• Role of People’s Representatives: These major decisions are taken by the people’s representatives, who are in touch with the feelings of the people.
• Post-independence, our country had to make a series of major decisions regarding the development of India which included both economic growth and social and economic justice.
• Government’s role of ensuring growth with justice has triggered disagreements regarding the extent of its involvement necessitating consultations among political parties and public approval.
  • Hence, a study of developmental processes is integral to understanding the political history of India.

Ideas of Development

Contradictions and Debates: Development, with different meanings for various sections of society, generates contradictions, conflicts, and debates.

• Development and Modernity: In the early post-independence period, ‘Development’ was equated with becoming more ‘modern‘, akin to industrialized Western countries, which involved breakdown of traditional social structures and rise of capitalism and liberalism.
• Classification of Countries: This modernization associated with the ideas of growth, material progress, and scientific rationality categorized different countries as developed, developing, or underdeveloped.
• India’s Dual Development Models: Post-independence, India had two models of modern development:
• The liberal-capitalist model as in much of Europe and the US;
• The socialist model, as in the USSR; was supported by leaders of Communist Party of India and Socialist Party and leaders like Nehru within the Congress.
• Consensus on Poverty Alleviation: There was a broad consensus during national movement to differ from colonial-era commercial interests, hence assigning primary responsibility for poverty alleviation and social and economic redistribution to the government.

Planning

• Consensus on Government Role: Despite all the differences, there was a consensus that development should not be solely entrusted to private actors and that government planning was necessary.
• Historical Experiences: This consensus was further strengthened with experiences like the Great Depression in Europe, post-war reconstruction in Japan and Germany, and the Soviet Union’s remarkable economic growth in the 1930s and 1940s.
• Indian economic planning has an evolutionary history from the Bombay Plan, where a section of big industrialists got together in 1944 and drafted a joint proposal for setting up a planned economy in the country.
• Establishment and Role of Planning Commission: Following India’s independence, Planning Commission was established, with the Prime Minister serving as its Chairperson, which became the central and influential body responsible for determining India’s development path and strategy.

Conclusion

Politics of planned development in India is a complex interplay of ideologies, interests, and historical experiences. Despite differing models and debates over the extent of government involvement, a broad consensus supports state-led planning to ensure equitable growth and social justice. The establishment of the Planning Commission post-independence marked a pivotal step in shaping India’s development trajectory, balancing diverse visions towards a common goal of national progress.

DOWNLOAD PDF