Introduction

“Prithivi tvam amritasya putri – O Earth, you are the daughter of immortality” (Rig Veda) reflects the sacredness of nature and our moral duty to safeguard it. In fragile border regions, this duty often collides with the imperative of national security. This intersection opens up complex ethical dilemmas that demand closer examination.

Body

Ethical Dilemmas in Environmental Clearances for Border Development

• Security Imperative vs. Ecological Responsibility: Defence projects like roads, tunnels, and hydro dams are justified for troop mobility and deterrence. Yet, they disturb fragile ecosystems, causing landslides, biodiversity loss, and climate risks. The ethical dilemma emerges in prioritizing immediate defence needs against the duty to protect nature.
• Present Security vs. Inter-generational Equity: Accelerating clearances safeguards present sovereignty. However, irreversible ecological damage compromises the rights of future generations, raising questions of fairness and stewardship.
• Strategic Secrecy vs. Procedural Justice: EIA stresses transparency and public participation. Security projects often bypass these due to secrecy. This creates a conflict between democratic accountability and the state’s duty of confidentiality.
• Utilitarian Justification vs. Moral Duty: A utilitarian logic supports environmental sacrifice for the greater good of national defence. Ethical theories rooted in deontology emphasize moral responsibility towards ecological preservation, regardless of outcomes. 
• National Security vs. Human Security: Infrastructure may strengthen border defence but displace local communities, erode cultural rights, and undermine livelihoods. The ethical concern arises when narrow state-centric security undermines holistic human well-being. 
• Short-term Expediency vs. Long-term Resilience: Expedient clearances enhance present preparedness. Yet, neglecting ecological safeguards increases vulnerability to disasters, even jeopardizing defence infrastructure itself.
• Sovereign Responsibility vs. Global Commitments: India must balance sovereign defence priorities with its ethical obligation under climate and biodiversity agreements. Ignoring ecological norms undermines credibility and global moral responsibility.

Conclusion

Ethical dilemmas in environmentally sensitive border areas demand balancing national security, development, and ecological responsibility. Policies must integrate justice, tribal rights, and sustainability. As the Rig Veda reminds us, protecting the Earth is a sacred duty, and ethical governance ensures that development strengthens the nation without eroding rights, culture, or the environment.

DOWNLOAD PDF