Answer
The case of Rajesh, a PSU officer, reflects the clash between career ambitions and ethical integrity. Pressures from superiors to bypass financial norms conflict with legal accountability, highlighting the administrative challenge of balancing obedience, personal interests, and probity in governance.
Stakeholders |
- Rajesh (Administrative Officer)
- Immediate Superior Officer
- Organisation / PSU
- Government & Audit Authorities
- Public / Citizens
- Future Officers/Employees
- Rajesh’s Family
|
(a) Options available with Rajesh
- Split the expenditure as per boss’s hint: Bypass rules to please boss and secure good ACR.
- Approve full purchase without sanction: Take decision himself, violating GFR; immediate compliance but audit risk.
- Escalate to higher authority for sanction: Follow rules strictly, get higher sanction, ensure transparency.
- Seek written directions from superior: Record decision trail; if superior insists, responsibility lies with him.
- Propose alternative vendors/smaller essential purchase: Buy only urgent items within limit, defer remaining till sanction.
- Refuse wrong practice firmly with courage: Uphold rule of law at risk of career progression.
Like Nachiketa (in Kathopanishad) who rejected temptations of Yama for truth; or Emperor Ashoka who abandoned unjust conquests after Kalinga.
(b) Ethical issues involved
- Integrity vs Career Progression: Whether to uphold probity in public spending or compromise rules for securing favourable ACR and promotion.
Like Harishchandra choosing truth over kingdom.
- Obedience vs Rule of Law: Choosing between blindly obeying superior’s instructions or adhering to legal provisions like GFR.
- Public Interest vs Personal Interest: Safeguarding public funds and institutional credibility versus advancing personal career goals.
- Accountability & Transparency: Following transparent procurement to ensure audit compliance versus hiding under informal practices like expenditure splitting.
- Conflict of Duty vs Emotion: Balancing professional ethical duty with emotional desire for career security and recognition.
(c) Most appropriate option for Rajesh and why
The best option is seek higher sanction as per GFR in addition to it, if pressured, ask for written orders along with partial procurement for urgent needs.
- This balances rule of law, accountability, transparency.
- Protects Rajesh’s ethical credibility in long run.
Conclusion
Rajesh must act with the spirit of Rama’s rajdharma, Nachiketa’s truthfulness, and Ashoka’s ethical awakening. By upholding GFR rules despite risks, he protects institutional integrity. Promotions may come and go, but ethical credibility sustains true civil servants.