Que. Rajesh is a Group A officer with nine years of service. He is posted as Administrative Officer in an Oil Public Sector undertaking. As an Administrative Officer he is responsible for managing and coordinating various administrative tasks to ensure smooth functioning of office. He also manages office supplies, equipment etc. Rajesh is now sufficient senior and is expecting his next promotion in JAG (Junior Administrative Grade) in the next one or two years. He knows that promotion is based on examination of ACRs/Performance Appraisal of last few years (5 years or so) of an officer by a DPC (Departmental Promotion Committee) and an officer lacking requisite grading of ACRs may not be found fit for promotion. Consequences of losing promotion may entail financial and reputational loss and set-back for career progression. Though he also puts his best efforts in official discharge of his duties, yet he is unsure of assessment by his superior officer. He is now putting extra efforts so that he gets thumping report at the end of financial year. As Administrative Officer, Rajesh is regularly interacting with his immediate boss, who is his reporting officer for writing his ACR. One day he calls Rajesh and wants him to buy computer-related stationary on priority from a particular vendor. Rajesh instructs his office to initiate action for procuring these items. During the day, the dealing Assistant brings an estimate of Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs covering all stationery items from the same vendor. It is noticed that as per delegated financial powers, as provided in the GFR (General Financial Rules) as applicable in that Organisation, expenditure for office items exceeding Rupees Thirty Lakhs requires sanction of the next higher authority (boss in the present case). Rajesh knows that immediate superior would expect all these purchases should be done at his level, and may not appreciate such lack of initiative on his part. During discussions with officer, he learns that common practice of splitting of expenditure (where large order is divided in a series of smaller ones) is followed to avoid obtaining sanction from higher authority. This practice is against the rules and may come to the adverse notice of Audit. Rajesh is perturbed. He is unsure of taking decision in the matter. (a) What are the options available with Rajesh in the above situation? (b) What are the ethical issues involved in this case? (c) Which would be the most appropriate option for Rajesh and why? (250 Words, 20 Marks)

UPSC CSE : 2025

Answer

The case of Rajesh, a PSU officer, reflects the clash between career ambitions and ethical integrity. Pressures from superiors to bypass financial norms conflict with legal accountability, highlighting the administrative challenge of balancing obedience, personal interests, and probity in governance.

 

Stakeholders
  • Rajesh (Administrative Officer)
  • Immediate Superior Officer
  • Organisation / PSU
  • Government & Audit Authorities
  • Public / Citizens
  • Future Officers/Employees
  • Rajesh’s Family

 

(a) Options available with Rajesh

  • Split the expenditure as per boss’s hint: Bypass rules to please boss and secure good ACR. 
  • Approve full purchase without sanction: Take decision himself, violating GFR; immediate compliance but audit risk.
  • Escalate to higher authority for sanction: Follow rules strictly, get higher sanction, ensure transparency.
  • Seek written directions from superior: Record decision trail; if superior insists, responsibility lies with him.
  • Propose alternative vendors/smaller essential purchase: Buy only urgent items within limit, defer remaining till sanction.
  • Refuse wrong practice firmly with courage: Uphold rule of law at risk of career progression.
    Like Nachiketa (in Kathopanishad) who rejected temptations of Yama for truth; or Emperor Ashoka who abandoned unjust conquests after Kalinga. 

(b) Ethical issues involved

  • Integrity vs Career Progression: Whether to uphold probity in public spending or compromise rules for securing favourable ACR and promotion.
    Like Harishchandra choosing truth over kingdom.
  • Obedience vs Rule of Law: Choosing between blindly obeying superior’s instructions or adhering to legal provisions like GFR.
  • Public Interest vs Personal Interest: Safeguarding public funds and institutional credibility versus advancing personal career goals.
  • Accountability & Transparency: Following transparent procurement to ensure audit compliance versus hiding under informal practices like expenditure splitting.
  • Conflict of Duty vs Emotion: Balancing professional ethical duty with emotional desire for career security and recognition. 

(c) Most appropriate option for Rajesh and why

The best option is seek higher sanction as per GFR in addition to it, if pressured, ask for written orders along with partial procurement for urgent needs.

  • This balances rule of law, accountability, transparency.
  • Protects Rajesh’s ethical credibility in long run.

Conclusion
Rajesh must act with the spirit of Rama’s rajdharma, Nachiketa’s truthfulness, and Ashoka’s ethical awakening. By upholding GFR rules despite risks, he protects institutional integrity. Promotions may come and go, but ethical credibility sustains true civil servants.

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">






    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.