Introduction
India initially embraced a mixed economy post-independence, integrating aspects of capitalism and socialism. In 1991, an economic crisis, marked by external debt challenges and declining foreign reserves, prompted a pivotal shift. The government initiated Liberalization, Privatisation, and Globalization (LPG) reforms, redirecting India towards a new developmental trajectory.
Overview of Indian Economy Prior 1991
- Production Across Countries
- Pre-20th century, production was mostly national, with global trade centered on raw materials, food, and finished goods, i.e colonial areas like India primarily exported raw materials and imported finished products.
- Situation Prior to the LPG Era
- Government funds were generated through taxation, public sector enterprises, and borrowing when expenditures exceed income.
- Economic Disparities and Fiscal Management
- Despite low revenues, increased government spending on unemployment, poverty, and population issues, with developmental programs failing to generate sufficient revenue,
- It was compounded by inadequate internal generation and reliance on non-immediate return areas, leading to a deficit as public sector undertakings’ income fell short of escalating expenditures.
- Foreign Exchange and International Borrowing
- Late 1980s: Widening gap between government revenue and expenditure, unsustainable borrowing, uncontrolled consumption-led use of foreign exchange, soaring essential goods prices, and a precarious depletion of foreign exchange reserves due to imbalanced imports and exports.
- Crisis Management and International Assistance
- Deepening crisis: Plummeting foreign exchange reserves prompt India to seek a $7 billion loan from the World Bank and IMF, contingent on economic liberalization, reduced government intervention, and trade restriction abolishment.
New Economic Policy (NEP) Introduction
- Complying with the international agencies’ conditions, India announced the New Economic Policy (NEP).
- The NEP encompassed two primary strategies:
- Stabilisation Measures: Short-term measures to rectify balance of payments discrepancies and control inflation by maintaining adequate foreign exchange reserves
- Structural Reform Measures: Long-term measures to augment the economy’s efficiency and international competitiveness by eliminating rigidities in various segments of the Indian economy.
- The core themes of the reforms were
- Liberalization: It is the direction of reforms.
- Privatisation: It is path to the reforms.
- Globalisation: It is the ultimate aim of reforms.
Liberalization
- Liberalization in 1991: Launched to remove governmental restrictions, granting businesses freedom in import-export decisions.
- Comprehensive Impact: Policies extended to industrial, financial, taxation, foreign exchange, trade, and investment sectors.
- Deregulation of the Industrial Sector
- Pre-1991 Regulatory Mechanisms: Stringent regulations included industrial licensing, limited private sector involvement, small-scale industries reservations, and controls on price and distribution.
- Post-1991 Reforms: Industrial licensing was abolished for most categories (exceptions for alcohol, hazardous chemicals).
- De-reservation of goods previously restricted to small-scale industries.
- Introduction of market-determined prices in most industries.
- Financial Sector Reforms
- Pre-1991 Financial Sector Regulation: Under stringent regulation by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), covering commercial banks, investment banks, stock exchanges, and the foreign exchange market.
- Post-1991 Reforms:
- Transitioned RBI’s role from regulator to facilitator, allowing the financial sector autonomy in decision-making.
- Facilitated establishment of private sector banks (Indian and foreign) with increased foreign investment limits (around 74%).
- Banks meeting certain conditions could establish branches and rationalize networks without RBI approval, while retaining some managerial aspects with RBI for stakeholder safeguarding.
- Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) like merchant bankers, mutual funds, and pension funds permitted to invest in Indian financial markets.
Tax Reforms
- Tax Reforms Post-1991: Focused on modifying government taxation and public expenditure policies as part of fiscal policy.
- Reduction in Income and Corporation Taxes:
- Witnessed a continuous reduction in individual income taxes and corporation tax rates post-1991.
- Aimed At: promoting savings, voluntary income disclosure, and compliance.
- Indirect Tax Reforms:
- Efforts made to reform indirect taxes on commodities.
- The goal was to establish a common national market for goods and commodities.
- Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act 2016:
- In 2016, efforts culminated in the establishment of a unified indirect tax system through the Goods and Services Tax Act 2016.
- Effective from July 2017, aimed at simplifying tax procedures and reducing evasion.
- Foreign Exchange Reforms
- 1991 Balance of Payments Crisis Response: Immediate devaluation of the rupee to address the crisis, boosting foreign exchange inflow.
- Exchange Rate Reforms:
- Initiated market-determined exchange rates post-1991.
- Based on foreign exchange demand and supply, reducing government control over the rupee’s value.
- Trade and Investment Policy Reforms
- Aimed at enhancing international competitiveness and attracting foreign investments and technology infusion.
- Dismantling Pre-Reform Policies: Abolished high tariffs and tight control over imports that hindered manufacturing sector growth and efficiency.
- Reform Measures (Effective from April 2001):
- Abolished import licensing (excluding hazardous and environmentally sensitive industries).
- Removed quantitative restrictions on imports and exports.
- Reduced tariff rates.
- Objectives:
-
- Boost competitive stance of Indian goods in international markets.
- Foster efficiency and modern technology adoption in local industries.
Privatisation
- Meaning: Privatisation denotes the transition from government ownership or management to private sector control of enterprises.
- This transition manifests in two primary ways:
- By the government relinquishing ownership and management of public sector companies.
- By the outright sale of such companies.
- Disinvestment is the strategic process through which the government reduces its ownership stake in public sector enterprises by selling shares to either strategic or financial buyers.
- This can be achieved through the sale of shares on stock exchanges or by directly selling shares to interested buyers.
- Approaches to Disinvestment:
- Minority Disinvestment: The government maintains a majority stake in the company, typically greater than 51%, ensuring that it retains management control.
- Majority Divestment: Control of the company is transferred to the acquiring entity, but the government retains some stake, allowing for continued involvement.
- Complete Privatisation: The entire 100% control of the company is transferred to the buyer, resulting in complete privatization.
- Disinvestment Process in India: In India, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM), under the Ministry of Finance, oversees the disinvestment process.
- National Investment Fund (NIF): To channelize the proceeds from the disinvestment of Central Public Sector Enterprises, the government established the National Investment Fund (NIF) in 2005.
- Benefits of Privatisation
- Facilitating Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Privatisation was envisaged as a catalyst for increasing the inflow of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), thereby contributing to economic growth and modernisation.
- Enhancing PSU Efficiency through Managerial Autonomy: The government aimed to boost the efficiency of PSUs by granting them managerial autonomy.
- This autonomy was manifested through the conferment of special statuses like Maharatnas, Navratnas, and Miniratnas on certain PSUs, empowering them with greater managerial discretion.
Navratnas and Public Enterprise Policies
- The government, drawing inspiration from the eminent ‘Navratnas’ or Nine Jewels of King Vikramaditya’s court, identified and designated Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) as Maharatnas, Navratnas, and Miniratnas.
- Operational Autonomy and Performance Enhancement:The designated PSEs were endowed with increased managerial and operational autonomy.
- This enhanced autonomy extended to operational, financial, and managerial realms.
- Examples of Designated Public Sector Enterprises:
- Maharatnas: Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Steel Authority of India Limited
- Navratnas: Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited
- Miniratnas: Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Airport Authority of India, Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited
Historical Context and Original Objectives of PSEs
- Self Reliance: The inception of many profitable PSEs dates back to the 1950s and 1960s, aligning with the public policy emphasis on self-reliance.
- Objectives: These enterprises were established with the dual aim of infrastructure provision and direct employment generations.
- Outcomes and Future Endeavours
-
- The conferred statuses contributed to the improved performance of these companies.
- Despite accusations of partial privatisation through disinvestment, the government, of late, has resolved to retain these enterprises in the public sector.
- The objective now is to facilitate their expansion into global markets and empower them to independently raise resources from financial markets.
|
- Trade Barriers: A tax on imports exemplifies a trade barrier, impacting the cost and quantity of goods imported.
- Trade barriers were employed by governments to regulate foreign trade, deciding the type and quantity of goods imported.
|
Globalization
- Globalization is broadly perceived as the integration of a nation’s economy with the global economy, fostering greater interdependence and integration.
- It is the ultimate aim of LPG reforms.
- The Siricilla Tragedy
- In line with liberalization, privatization, and globalization (LPG), the government introduced reforms in the power sector.
- Consequences of the Reforms
- Tariff Hikes: The most notable outcome was a significant increase in power tariffs.
- Effect on the Power Loom Industry: Power looms, a crucial part of the cottage and small-scale sector, rely heavily on power.
- High tariffs severely impacted these industries, especially since power producers failed to provide consistent and quality power.
- With wages tied to production, power cuts directly affected the earnings of power loom workers.
- The Tragedy
- The combination of increased tariffs and inconsistent power supply led to a financial crisis for the weavers.
- In Siricilla, a town in Andhra Pradesh, the situation became so dire that fifty power loom workers took their own lives.
|
Indian Economy During Reforms: An Assessment
- As the reform process in India completes three decades, an assessment of the Indian economy reveals a mixed scenario.
- Growth is primarily gauged by the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
- GDP Growth and Sectoral Performance
Post-1991: India saw a substantial rise in GDP growth, from 5.6% during 1980-91 to 8.2% during 2007-12, mainly driven by the service sector. Refer to table 13.1
- However, the agriculture sector saw a decline in growth, while the industrial sector showed fluctuations.
- Despite a setback in growth rates across sectors during 2012-15, the service sector continued to thrive, notably with a 9.8% growth rate in 2014-15.
- Foreign Investments and Reserves
- The reform era ushered in a significant increase in foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign exchange reserves, with FDI and foreign institutional investment (FII) rising from about US $100 million in 1990-91 to US $30 billion in 2017-18.
- Foreign exchange reserves surged from about US $6 billion in 1990-91 to about US $413 billion in 2018-19 (In October 2021 and , making India one of the largest foreign exchange reserve holders globally.
- Export Dynamics
- India emerged as a successful exporter of auto parts, pharmaceutical goods, engineering goods, IT software, and textiles post-1991.
Conclusion
- India’s shift from a mixed economy to embracing globalization post-1991 has brought both opportunities and challenges.
- Key reforms aimed at attracting foreign investment and integrating India with the global economy yielded mixed outcomes.
- While urban consumers and certain sectors like IT benefited, the agrarian sector and small producers faced hurdles. The chapter underlines the need for a balanced approach to ensure ‘fair globalization’, safeguarding the interests of the less privileged while fostering inclusive growth.