The Supreme Court of India has directed the Manipur government to reveal details of property damage and encroachment after ethnic violence. This highlights the failure of local and national authorities to address the crisis and raises concerns about the judiciary’s role in conflict resolution when the executive fails to act.
Role of Supreme Court
- Failure of the Executive: Initially, the steps taken by the Court, such as the extension of the Justice Gita Mittal-led Committee’s tenure to supervise investigations into the violence and the provision of humanitarian assistance, should have been the responsibility of the executive branch.
- However, the nature of the violence, which involved sexual violence, the destruction of property, and ethnic clashes, compelled the Court to step in.
Enroll now for UPSC Online Course
Meiteis account for about 53 per cent of Manipur’s population and live mostly in the Imphal Valley
Tribals, which include Nagas and Kukis, constitute 40 per cent and reside mostly in the hill districts.
- History: On 3 May 2023, the Kuki community protested against Meitei’s long-standing demand that the latter be included in the list of the state’s Scheduled Tribes (ST), which received a boost following an order of the Manipur High Court, directing the State Government to consider Meitei Tribe for Schedule Tribe.
- For other recognised tribes, an ST status to Meitei would hence mean losing job opportunities, land rights and other perks to a much-advanced community.
- Ethnic Divide: The Meitei community opposed the privileges and special land rights granted to the Naga and Kuki tribes.
- The loss of identity, and the struggle to restore it, remains at the heart of the Meitei movement, and is foundational in Manipuri society.
- Sons of Soil: This situation mirrors a ‘sons of the soil’ type of insurgency, where a native group feels threatened by outsider ethnic groups.
|
Rise of Non-State Actors
- Armed with sophisticated weapons, many of which have been looted from State armouries, these non-state actors have begun exerting their influence on the political process, further intensifying the conflict.
- Places like Jiribam, which had previously been peaceful, are now witnessing violence due to the spread of ethnic hostility.
- The growing power of these non-state actors, engaging in violent acts with impunity, is a sign of how the conflict has spiraled out of control and out of the government’s hands.
- Manipur’s ethnic violence has garnered national attention only when the scale of the violence became horrifying and reached unconscionable levels.
Secrecy by the Government
- The attorneys representing the government have been said to impose a veil of secrecy over the workings and findings of the Justice Mittal-led Committee, invoking the argument of “national security” as the reason for withholding information.
Truth and Reconciliation Mechanisms
- Conflict resolution worldwide has often focused on mechanisms like “truth and reconciliation” exercises, which aim to prioritize accountability and normative actions over political expediency.
- This also bridges the social and political gaps while bringing peace.
- This can be seen during the Civil war in Sri Lanka and the apartheid period of South Africa.
Check Out UPSC Modules From PW Store
Conclusion
The Justice Mittal Committee’s findings and its role in pushing for such accountability can be crucial in moving the situation forward.
Without a formal mechanism for truth-telling and addressing the root causes of the violence, Manipur will continue to suffer from ongoing instability and division.