Answer

The World Trade Organization (WTO), founded in 1995, serves as the custodian of multilateral trade, promoting predictability and reducing barriers. However, economic nationalism, driven by protectionist policies, and trade wars, such as the US-China tariff dispute, challenge its authority. In a fragmented global economy, revitalizing WTO’s role is critical to preserving rules-based trade governance.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

WTO and its Role in Facilitating Free and Fair Trade

• Reduction of Trade Barriers: The WTO was established to lower tariffs and eliminate trade barriers, ensuring goods and services move freely across borders.
  For example: The Uruguay Round (1986-1994) successfully reduced average global tariffs on manufactured goods by 40%, fostering smoother global trade.
• Dispute Resolution Mechanism: The WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) ensured member nations could resolve trade disputes transparently and efficiently.
  For example: In 2002, the WTO resolved the US-EU steel tariff dispute, compelling the US to withdraw illegal tariffs on imported steel.
• Promotion of Multilateral Agreements: The WTO enabled multilateral agreements to harmonize trade policies, facilitating fair competition and fostering global economic integration.
  For example: The Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement standardized IPR regulations worldwide.
• Development Focus: The WTO addressed inequalities by initiating programs like the Doha Development Agenda to improve market access for developing nations.
  For example: Under the WTO’s “Aid for Trade” initiative, countries like Rwanda received funding to build export capabilities for coffee and tea.
• Ensuring Predictability in Trade Rules: The WTO established a framework of predictable and transparent trade rules, fostering trust and stability in global commerce.
  For example: The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) provided legal certainty for international service providers.

Declining Influence of WTO due to Economic Nationalism and Trade Wars

• Dysfunctional Dispute Settlement Mechanism: The US blocked judicial appointments to the WTO’s Appellate Body, paralyzing its ability to resolve trade disputes since 2019.
• Rise of Trade Wars: Major economies like the US and China resorted to unilateral tariffs, sidelining the WTO’s framework and escalating trade tensions.
  For example: The US imposed tariffs on $360 billion worth of Chinese goods in the US-China trade war, bypassing WTO mechanisms.
• Shift Toward Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs): The preference for RTAs like the RCEP has reduced the WTO’s role in global trade liberalization.
  For example: The RCEP, involving 15 nations, covers 30% of global GDP, undermining the WTO’s multilateral approach.
• Manipulation of IPR Regulations: Developed nations used IPR rules under TRIPS to prioritize their industries, often at the expense of developing nations.
  For example: During the COVID-19 pandemic, delays in patent waivers for vaccines under TRIPS hindered equitable vaccine distribution.
• Erosion of Trust Among Developing Nations: The WTO failed to address agricultural subsidies and non-tariff barriers, creating an uneven playing field for developing countries.
  For example: The EU’s agricultural subsidies, amounting to $61 billion in 2021, hurt exporters from developing nations like India and Brazil.

Factors Contributing to WTO’s Decline

• Failure in E-Commerce: The WTO has not developed comprehensive rules for digital trade, leaving significant gaps in regulating the global digital economy.
  For example: The WTO’s inability to regulate e-commerce disputes led to friction over India’s data localization laws, affecting companies like Google and Amazon.
• Developed-Developing Divide: Conflicts between developed and developing nations on subsidies, labor, and environment standards have led to a deadlock in trade negotiations.
  For example: Doha Round negotiations collapsed as India and the US disagreed over market access and agricultural subsidies.
• Consensus-Based Inefficiency: The WTO’s reliance on unanimous decision-making among 164 members has led to slow reforms and gridlocks in negotiations.
  For example: Disagreements over fisheries subsidies caused years of delays in reaching a global consensus on overfishing rules.
• Weak Rule Enforcement: The WTO lacks punitive mechanisms for countries that violate trade rules, undermining its authority.
• Declining Resources: Budget constraints have reduced the WTO’s ability to address emerging trade challenges and fund operational needs.
  For example: The WTO’s limited resources in 2022 curtailed its engagement in resolving global trade imbalances compared to RTAs like RCEP.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Measures to Restore WTO’s Credibility and Effectiveness

• Reform Dispute Mechanism: Reinstating the Appellate Body and appointing judges would ensure the enforcement of trade rules and restore trust in the system.
  For example: The WTO could resolve trade disputes like the US-China tariff conflict more effectively with a functioning dispute mechanism.
• Inclusive Multilateral Negotiations: Encourage dialogue among member nations to prioritize global over regional agreements, addressing the rise of economic nationalism.
  For example: The WTO can mediate between the US and EU on digital trade taxation to prevent unilateral measures.
• Address Developing Nations’ Concerns: Focus on completing the Doha Development Agenda to ensure fair agricultural policies and reduce trade inequalities.
  For example: The WTO could cap agricultural subsidies in developed nations like the EU to level the playing field for exporters from developing nations.
• Responsiveness to Global Crises: Reform TRIPS agreements to allow faster action during emergencies like pandemics for equitable access to essential goods.
  For example: Expediting vaccine patent waivers during COVID-19 would have enabled broader distribution in countries like India and South Africa.
• Cooperation on Emerging Trade Issues: Incorporate global challenges like climate change, digital trade, and e-commerce into WTO’s agenda to remain relevant.
  For example: The WTO can create frameworks for regulating cross-border e-commerce, addressing disputes like India’s data localization policies and US tech giants.

Reviving the WTO demands global collaboration and a commitment to reforming outdated frameworks. By addressing imbalances, promoting inclusivity, and adopting digital trade norms, the WTO can reclaim its role as a beacon of fair trade and multilateralism. “Unite for trade, thrive together” must guide nations toward a future of equitable global commerce.

DOWNLOAD PDF