Q. Nepotism often influences opportunities in various social and professional spheres. Explain how nepotism differs from a merit-based system and discuss its implications for Indian society. (10 Marks, 150 words)

Core Demand of the Question

  • Difference between Nepotism and Merit Based System.
  • Implication on Indian Society. 

Answer

Introduction

Nepotism, favouring relatives or close associates, often undermines merit and fairness across politics, business, and entertainment. Recent Gen Z protests in Nepal demanding transparency highlight rising discontent against such practices and the push for accountability.

Body

Parameter Nepotism Merit-Based System
Basis of Opportunity Opportunities are given based on family, kinship, or personal connections. Opportunities are awarded based on skills, performance, and qualifications.
Fairness Often unfair and biased, favoring a few privileged individuals. Transparent and equitable, rewarding competence and talent.
Social Mobility Limits upward mobility for capable individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds. Promotes social mobility and equality by rewarding talent.
Performance Outcomes May lead to underperformance as positions are not earned based on ability. Encourages high performance and productivity as positions are earned on merit.
Perception in Society Seen as unethical and eroding trust in institutions. Strengthens trust in institutions and fosters a culture of accountability.

Implication of Nepotism in Indian Society

Nepotism fosters trust, loyalty, and smooth coordination, ensures quick decision-making, continuity, and preserves organizational values. However, it also has negative implications.

Negative Implications

  • Erosion of Meritocracy: Nepotism undermines merit, limiting opportunities for talented individuals, particularly from marginalized communities.
    Eg: Preference for family connections in Bollywood or politics often sidelines capable newcomers.
  • Social Inequality: It reinforces existing hierarchies, widening the gap between elites and common citizens.
  • Reduced Institutional Efficiency: Appointments based on connections rather than competence compromise work quality in public and private sectors.
  • Public Distrust: Widespread nepotism develops distrust, reducing confidence in institutions and discouraging participation.
    Eg: Citizens feel disillusioned when deserving candidates are overlooked in professional sectors.
  • Hindrance to Economic Growth and Innovation: Nepotism limits competition, discouraging skilled professionals, and stifling creativity.
    Eg: Startups or merit-driven teams often outperform family-run enterprises, but nepotism delays talent integration.

Conclusion

While nepotism can foster trust and continuity, it broadly erodes meritocracy, deepens inequality, and weakens institutions. Combating it requires transparent recruitment, equal opportunity policies, and a culture valuing talent over connections.

To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">






    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.