Answer

Introduction

The digital era, dominated by algorithm-driven social media and online platforms, shapes public opinion, political discourse, and personal beliefs. While it enables information access and civic engagement, its architecture prioritizing virality, outrage, and binary narratives can both challenge and, paradoxically, reinforce Gandhian ideals of Satya, Ahimsa, and Swaraj.

Body

Threats Posed by the Digital World to Gandhian Ideals

• Erosion of Satya (Truth): Algorithms prioritize engagement over verified facts.
  Eg: Spread of COVID-19 misinformation via WhatsApp and social media.
• Promotion of Polarization: Digital echo chambers amplify “us vs. them” narratives.
  Eg: Communal tensions in India fueled by viral misinformation in 2018–19.
• Undermining Ahimsa (Non-violence): Online harassment, trolling, and hate speech escalate social harm.
  Eg: Targeted cyberbullying of journalists and activists critical of government policies.
• Loss of Swaraj (Self-rule): Algorithmic nudges compromise individual autonomy in forming opinions.
  Eg: Filter bubbles on YouTube and Facebook influencing political perceptions subconsciously.
• Commercialization of Attention: Outrage-driven content is monetized, incentivizing sensationalism over ethical discourse.
  Eg: YouTube recommendation engine promoting incendiary political videos for higher watch time.
  

Counter-Perspective: No Threats / Positive Aspects

• Empowerment through Access to Information: Digital platforms can enhance transparency and awareness.
  Eg: Online campaigns for environmental conservation or public health awareness during COVID-19.
• Platform for Non-violent Advocacy: Social media enables constructive activism and Gandhian-style campaigns.
  Eg: #SaveGirlChild, #SwachhBharat initiatives mobilizing mass participation peacefully.
• Fact-checking Networks: Technology can enforce Satya by verifying and curbing misinformation.
  Eg: Alt News and Boom FactCheck actively counter viral false claims.
• Civic Engagement and Swaraj: Users can participate in debates, petitions, and decision-making processes.
  Eg: E-petitions and online public consultations by government platforms.
• Digital Solidarity: Networks can foster empathy and cooperation across communities.
  Eg: Online fundraising and disaster relief coordination during natural calamities.
  

Gandhian Philosophy as a Moral Compass

• Satya (Truth) – Ethical Sharing: Verify and propagate accurate information online.
  Eg: Gandhi’s emphasis on honest reporting in Young India.
• Ahimsa (Non-violence) – Responsible Communication: Avoid content that incites harm or hostility.
  Eg: Gandhian approach to communal harmony inspiring cyberethics campaigns.
• Swaraj (Self-rule) – Digital Autonomy: Exercise mindful, independent judgment rather than following algorithms blindly.
  Eg: Personal discipline in selecting credible sources and resisting sensationalism.
• Constructive Dialogue: Encourage inclusive and empathetic engagement in online discussions.
  Eg: Gandhian principles applied to promote respectful debate on Twitter threads.
• Public Accountability and Ethical Leadership: Platforms and users uphold transparency, fairness, and integrity in online spaces.
  Eg: Social media platforms integrating community guidelines and fact-checking to reduce misinformation.
  

Conclusion 

The digital world poses both challenges and opportunities for Gandhian ideals. While algorithms amplify misinformation, polarization, and outrage, Gandhian philosophy provides a moral compass, emphasizing truth, non-violence, and self-rule. Integrating these principles into digital literacy, content moderation, and civic responsibility ensures ethical engagement, strengthens democratic discourse, and aligns technological progress with moral and social well-being.

DOWNLOAD PDF