On India and Donald Trump’s Board of Peace (BoP)

India skipped the Trump-led “Board of Peace” charter announcement at Davos but is still examining the invitation to join the mechanism.

Background

• Post-War Context:  After the 2023 Hamas–Israel conflict that destroyed about 90 per cent of Gaza’s infrastructure and caused over 70,000 Palestinian deaths, Trump mediated a ceasefire.
  • He proposed the creation of a Board of Peace as an international mechanism to oversee stabilisation and reconstruction in the Gaza Strip.
• Board of Peace (BoP): The Primary functions of the board are intended to oversee humanitarian aid, reconstruction efforts, and development in Gaza.
• Supervisory Role: It will serve as a supervisory body, supported by an executive committee, to implement specific tasks
• Global Ambition: Trump views this board as a model that can be shifted to resolve other global conflicts, effectively creating a parallel system to the UN Security Council, which he believes is failing.

Membership and Mechanics of the Board of Peace (BoP) 

• Entry Fee: The board is described as an “exclusive club” with a $1 billion membership fee.
• Leadership: Donald Trump serves as the Chairman of the Board.
• Current Members: Over 20 nations have joined, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Turkey, and Pakistan.
• Dissenting Nations: Russia and China have remained sidelined due to concerns about Trump’s unilateral control, while Norway and Sweden have outright refused to join.

Arguments for India Joining

• Global Leadership: Joining would protect India’s image as a “Vishwabhandu” (friend of the world) and its role as a leader of the Global South.
• Historical Precedent: India has a history of leading peace missions, such as the 1953 Neutral Nations Repatriation Commission in Korea and commissions in Vietnam.
• Economic Gains: Membership could enable Indian companies to secure contracts to rebuild schools, roads, and hospitals in Gaza.
• Strategic Diplomacy: It could serve as an “insurance policy” to help India negotiate with Trump regarding his 50% trade tariffs.
•  FOMO: There is a “Fear Of Missing Out” as many other significant nations have already committed to the board

Arguments Against India Joining

• Colonialism 2.0: The board is viewed as a “trusteeship trap” because it imposes governance from the outside without the consent of the Palestinian people.
• Loss of Autonomy: India risks losing its strategic autonomy by becoming a “junior partner” or follower of the US in a “pay-to-play” scheme.
• Exclusion of Palestinian Leadership: Palestinian political representatives are excluded, while Israeli leadership is included.
• Credibility Issues: Supporting a body that justifies the occupation of Gaza could damage India’s reputation for fairness among African and Latin American nations.
• Negative Peace: Critics argue that the board only offers “negative peace” rather than “positive peace“.
  • According to Johan Galtung, negative peace is merely the absence of direct violence, whereas positive peace is the presence of social justice and institutions that eliminate structural causes of conflict.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store

Way Forward

• Wait and Watch: India should adopt a cautious approach and make calculated, rather than emotional, decisions.
• Independent Aid: India could continue providing humanitarian aid independently without formally joining the board.
• Conditions for Entry: India should insist that Palestinian political leaders be included in the board, as currently only Israeli leadership is represented.
• UN Principles: India should only join if the board follows UN Charter principles, though this is unlikely, as Trump intends to replace the UN system

Conclusion

India must weigh humanitarian concern with institutional legitimacy and moral credibility.  Strategic patience protects India’s interests better than rushed participation in a flawed mechanism.

DOWNLOAD PDF