//php print_r(get_the_ID()); ?>
Madhavi Gaur February 24, 2024 12:35 14026 0
Explore the importanc and implication of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which granted special autonomous status to the region of Jammu and Kashmir, until its abrogation in 2019. Understand the historical context, legal ramifications, and socio-political dynamics surrounding this constitutional provision.
Article 370 was a provision in the Constitution of India that granted a special autonomous status to the region of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). It was included in Part XXI of the Indian Constitution under the heading “Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions.”
Article 370 granted the state of Jammu and Kashmir significant autonomy, allowing it to have its own constitution, flag, and autonomy over internal affairs, except for matters such as defence, foreign affairs, finance, and communications, which were under the jurisdiction of the Indian government. This article also restricted the application of Indian laws in the state.
On August 5, 2019, the Government of India announced the abrogation of Article 370 through a presidential order. This move was accompanied by the reorganization of the state into two separate Union Territories: (J&K) and Ladakh.
Overview of the accession of Jammu and Kashmir into the Indian UnionPartition and Independence (1947): Following the partition of British India in 1947 into India and Pakistan, princely states were given the option to accede to either India or Pakistan, based on geographical contiguity, demographics, and the wishes of the princely states’ rulers. J&K, a princely state with a Muslim-majority population and a Hindu ruler, Maharaja Hari Singh, became a crucial point of contention between India and Pakistan. Accession to India: Initially, Maharaja Hari Singh, the ruler of J&K, wanted to maintain independence. However, as tribal invaders from Pakistan launched attacks on the region, he sought military assistance from India. In October 1947, he signed the Instrument of Accession, acceding the princely state to India. Acceptance by India: The Instrument of Accession was accepted by the Governor-General of India, Lord Mountbatten, on behalf of the Government of India, leading to the deployment of Indian troops in J&K to repel the invaders. United Nations Intervention: India’s decision to send troops to J&K led to international scrutiny, with Pakistan taking the matter to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). A ceasefire was eventually brokered, leading to the Line of Control (LoC) being established, dividing the region into territories administered by India and Pakistan. Article 370: As part of the accession negotiations, Article 370 was included in the Indian Constitution, granting special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. |
---|
Article 370 was included in the Constitution of India primarily to address the unique circumstances surrounding the accession of the princely state of J&K to the newly independent India in 1947.
Key factors that led to the inclusion of Article 370:
The historical background of Article 370 spans several decades, from its inclusion in the Constitution of India in 1949 to its eventual abrogation in 2019.
Here’s an overview of the key events and developments during this period:
Article 35AArticle 35A of the Indian Constitution was a provision that empowered the J&K state legislature to define “permanent residents” of the state and provide them special rights and privileges. It was introduced in 1954 through a Presidential Order, not directly enshrined in the Constitution itself. Here’s a breakdown of what Article 35A entailed: Special Rights for Permanent Residents: The J&K legislature could define who qualified as a “permanent resident” and grant them exclusive rights, including:
Restricted Rights for Others: People who weren’t classified as permanent residents had limited rights in J&K compared to Indian citizens elsewhere. Abrogation of Article 35A: In 2019, the Indian government revoked Article 35A along with Article 370, which granted special autonomous status to J&K. |
---|
The abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A involved a multi-step process, including legal, constitutional, and political actions:
The decision to abrogate Article 370 was driven by several factors and perceived needs, according to the Indian government:
The most recent development regarding Article 370 was the Supreme Court of India’s verdict delivered on December 11th, 2023. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:
The abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A marked a significant turning point in the history of Jammu and Kashmir, with far-reaching implications for its governance, integration with India, and socio-political dynamics. Since the abrogation, there have been both positive developments and challenges.
The Supreme Court of India’s recent verdict upholding the abrogation reaffirms the legality of the government’s actions and provides clarity on the status of J&K. Furthermore, the court’s emphasis on restoring statehood and holding elections by September 2024 signals a commitment to democratic principles and the empowerment of the region’s residents.
However, challenges remain, including security concerns, social unrest, and the need to address grievances. Moving forward, it is essential to focus on restoring normalcy, promoting economic development, and fostering social cohesion in Jammu and Kashmir. The principle of Ek Bharat Shrestha Bharat, which promote national integration and unity, should guide efforts to strengthen the bonds between J&K and the rest of India. By embracing diversity, fostering dialogue, and addressing the needs and aspirations of all stakeholders, India can realize its vision of a united and prosperous nation.
Must Read | |
NCERT Notes For UPSC | UPSC Daily Current Affairs |
UPSC Blogs | UPSC Daily Editorials |
Daily Current Affairs Quiz | Daily Main Answer Writing |
UPSC Mains Previous Year Papers | UPSC Test Series 2024 |
<div class="new-fform">
</div>
Latest Comments