Gaurav Soni
September 30, 2023 05:31
2765
0
Q10). Vinod is an honest and sincere IAS officer. Recently, he has taken over as Managing Director of the State Road Transport Corporation, his sixth transfer in the past three years. His peers acknowledge his vast knowledge, affability and uprightness. The Chairman of the State Road Transport Corporation is a powerful politician and is very close to the Chief Minister. Vinod comes to know about many alleged irregularities of the Corporation and the high-handedness of the Chairman in financial Matters. A Board Member of the Corporation belonging to the Opposition Party meets Vinod and hands over a few documents along with a video recording in which the Chairman appears to be demanding bribe for placing a huge order for the supply of QMR tyres. Vinod recollects the Chairman expediting clearing of pending bills of QMR tyres. Vinod confronts the Board Member as to why he is shying away from exposing the Chairman with the so-called solid proof he has with him. The member informs him that the Chairman refuses to yield to his threats. He adds that Vinod may earn recognition and public support if he himself exposes the Chairman. Further, he tells Vinod that once his party comes to power, Vinod’s professional growth would be assured. Vinod is aware that he may be penalized if he exposes the Chairman and may further be transferred to a distant place. He knows that the Opposition Party stands a better chance of coming to power in the forthcoming elections. However, he also realizes that the Board Member is trying to use him for his own political gains.
○ As a conscientious civil servant, evaluate the options available to Vinod.
○ In the light of the above case, comment upon the ethical issues that may arise due to the politicization of bureaucracy.
Ans:
This case revolves around Vinod, an honest IAS officer, who becomes the Managing Director of the State Road Transport Corporation amid allegations of corruption involving the Chairman. With evidence in hand, Vinod faces an ethical dilemma: expose the Chairman and risk his career, or navigate the political landscape. This highlights the ethical issues tied to bureaucracy’s politicization.
Stakeholders Involved and their Interests:
Options Available to Vinod and Their Evaluation:
Option-1 Confronting the Chairman:
Pros:
Cons:
Option-2 Whistle-blowing:
Pros:
Cons:
Option-3 Cooperating with the Board Member:
Pros:
Cons:
Option-4 Internal Investigation
Pros:
Cons:
Ethical Issues Due to Politicization of Bureaucracy:
Way Forward
Conclusion
In facing this complex ethical dilemma, Vinod must remain steadfast in his role as a civil servant, upholding his ethical principles while prioritizing the public’s welfare. This commitment can pave the way for greater transparency, accountability, and ethical leadership in the bureaucracy, ultimately benefiting society at large.
| For a Detailed explanation of the UPSC GS-01 Mains question 2023, click here.
For a Detailed explanation of the UPSC GS-02 Mains question 2023, click here. For a Detailed explanation of the UPSC GS-03 Mains question 2023, click here. For a Detailed explanation of the UPSC GS-04 Mains question 2023, click here. |
.png)
Learn From India's Best Faculty
Learn From India's Best Faculty
<div class="new-fform">
</div>
Latest Comments