Overview of Recent Criminal Law Reforms: Features, Challenges, and Implications for India

PWOnlyIAS February 24, 2024 04:48 7067 0

According to recent Union Home Ministry notification, three recently passed criminal law reforms will be enforced from July 1, 2024.

Overview of Recent Criminal Law Reforms: Features, Challenges, and Implications for India

According to a recent Union Home Ministry notification, three recently passed criminal law reforms will be enforced from July 1, 2024.

Overview of Recent Criminal Law Reforms in India

The Criminal laws – the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Bharatiya Sakshya Act – got the Parliament’s approval on December 21, 2023, during the winter session and President’s assent on December 25, 2023.

These laws will replace the British-era Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Indian Evidence Act of 1872.

  • The Indian Penal Code functions as the substantive law delineating the rights and obligations of citizens.
  • Code of Criminal Procedure outlines the procedures by which these substantive laws are to be enforced.
  • Indian Evidence Act plays a crucial role in specifying the admissibility of statements in court and the presentation of evidence.

Criminal Law Reforms

Need For Criminal Law Reforms in India

  • Colonial Legacy: The previous laws were a legacy of British colonial rule, crafted to uphold their influence over India’s legal system.
    • Example: Section 124A of the IPC, criminalising sedition, was introduced by the British to suppress dissent against colonial rule. It remains controversial for its potential misuse against activists and journalists.
  • Punishment-Centric Approach: The earlier laws prioritised punishment over ensuring justice for citizens.
    • Example: The death penalty exists for several offences in the IPC, often drawing debate on its effectiveness as a deterrent and its alignment with evolving societal values.
  • Outdated Framework: Enacted in the 19th century, the laws did not align with contemporary societal norms, technological advancements, or the evolving needs of justice.
    • In 2018, the Supreme Court struck down adultery as unconstitutional, highlighting the need for laws to adapt to social changes.
  • Low Conviction RatesThe antiquated laws contributed to low conviction rates and prolonged legal processes, diminishing public trust in the legal system
    • In 2022, India’s National Crime Records Bureau reported a conviction rate of just 19.7% for heinous crimes like murder and rape..
  • Gender Insensitivity: The previous laws inadequately addressed crimes against women and children, reflecting a lack of sensitivity.
    • A 2020 survey by the National Family Health Survey-5 found that one in three women in India have experienced physical or sexual violence, indicating the need for robust legal protections against gender-based crimes.
  • Complex Procedures: Complicated procedures and excessive paperwork led to delayed trials and inefficiencies in the criminal justice system.
    • A  2023 study by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation found that only 0.1% of witnesses in rape cases receive any form of protection, hindering prosecution efforts.
  • Potential for Misuse: Authorities could misuse the laws to target individuals and infringe on civil liberties, such as the misuse of sedition charges.
    • Example: The vague definition of “unlawful activities” in anti-terrorism laws has been used to target minority groups and activists, raising concerns about human rights violations.
  • Lack of Victim-Centric Focus: The focus often centred on legal technicalities rather than providing support and justice for victims.
    • A 2022 report by the National Crime Victims Relief Fund found that only 30% of eligible victims receive compensation, highlighting the need for a streamlined and accessible system.
  • Inadequate Technological Integration: The older laws lacked provisions for leveraging modern technology, impeding efficient investigation and evidence presentation.
    • India witnessed over 2.4 million cybercrime cases in 2022, but the conviction rate stands at a mere 3.4%, showcasing the need for technological advancements and skilled cybercrime investigators.
  • Limited Scope: The laws failed to adequately address contemporary issues like cybercrimes, terrorism, and organised crime.
    • Emerging crimes like crypto-jacking and drone-based attacks lack specific legal frameworks, leaving authorities unprepared and response mechanisms unclear.

Committee on Criminal Law Reforms

Recent Committee on Criminal Law Reforms

Suggested Reforms

Ranbir Singh Committee

  • The Ministry of Home Affairs through a notification dated May 4, 2020, constituted a committee to review the three codes of criminal law.
  • It was headed by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi.
  • Special laws and fast-track courts.In order to reduce the number of cases that accumulate at each police station, certain offenses in the Indian Penal Code could be replaced with special laws and fast-track courts.
  • Digitisation of Justice: Digitisation of records would help in accelerating examinations and preliminaries.
  • Characterization of offences: The development of new offences and revamping of the current characterization of offences should be directed by the standards of criminal statute which have significantly changed in the past forty years.
  • Management of crimes:  The grouping of offences should be finished in a way helpful for the board of wrongdoings later on.
  • Standards of legal point of reference: The carefulness of judges in choosing the quantum and nature of sentence contrastingly for wrongdoings of a similar sort ought to be founded on standards of legal point of reference.

 

Earlier Committees on Criminal Law Reforms 

Suggested Reforms

Madhav Menon Committee on Reforms in the Criminal Justice System (2007): This committee drafted a national policy paper on criminal justice reforms in India, focusing on issues like witness protection, sentencing, and judicial administration. Social Welfare Offences Code (SWOC):

  • Encompasses civil crimes of a less severe nature.
  • Examples include small marriage offences, prohibition offences, vagrancy, and minor indiscipline on campuses and workplaces.
  • Local bodies may be entrusted with handling such cases, aligning with the SWOC.

Correctional Offences Code (COC):

  • Addresses crimes punishable with up to three years in jail or a fine.
  • Allows for arrest and detention, but emphasises alternative dispute resolution methods like lok adalats and plea bargaining.
  • Aims to expedite case resolution, avoiding prolonged trials.

Penal Code (PC):

  • Deals with graver offences punishable with imprisonment beyond three years.
  • Includes offences deserving careful and quick processing under expert supervision.
  • Emphasises the need for greater accountability from enforcement agencies, considering the potential for public alarm and insecurity.

Economic Offences Code (EOC):

  • Targets select cases falling under the Indian Penal Code and relevant economic laws.
  • Addresses offences of an economic nature.
  • Requires specialised attention to ensure effective handling and adjudication.
Malimath Committee: Officially known as the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System, was a committee appointed by the Government of India to review the criminal justice system in the country. Police Reform:

  • Encouraged for police changes to upgrade effectiveness, straightforwardness, and responsibility.
  • Proposed the foundation of a State Security Commission to guarantee that the state government doesn’t practise unjustifiable impact or strain on the police.

Job of Judges:

  • Suggested that officers ought to assume a more dynamic part in the examination cycle.
  • Supported for the utilisation of present day innovation in examination processes.

Bail Arrangements:

  • Suggested a relook at the bail arrangements to work out some kind of harmony between the privileges of the accused and the interests for society.

Condemning Rules:

  • Proposed the definition of condemning rules to guarantee consistency and consistency in condemning.

Witness Security:

  • Underscored the requirement for witness assurance systems to urge observers to approach unafraid of responses.

Utilisation of Plea Bargaining:

  • Proposed the acquaintance of request dealing with assisting the removal of minor offences.

 juvenile justice laws

  • To address concerns regarding juvenile offenders, a comprehensive review of juvenile justice laws was recommended.

Features of New Criminal Law Reforms

Features

Existing Laws (IPC, CrPC, IEA)

New Criminal Laws: (BNS, BNSS, BSB)

Key Changes in New Criminal Laws

Scope of Offences IPC defines various crimes. BNS aims to simplify and clarify offences, categorising them into minor, major, and heinous. Potential for clearer sentencing guidelines and easier understanding of crimes.
Investigation & Trial Procedures CrPC outlines procedures for investigation, trial, and appeals. BNSS focuses on speedy trials, witness protection, and victim assistance. Aims to reduce delays, improve witness protection, and offer a victim-centric approach.
Evidence Admissibility IEA determines what evidence is admissible in court. BSB proposes stricter standards for electronic evidence and introduces “judicial discretion” for certain evidence. Potential for tighter control over electronic evidence and more flexible handling of sensitive information.
Punishment & Sentencing IPC prescribes punishments for various offences. BNS introduces tiered sentencing based on offence severity and mitigating factors. Potentially fairer sentencing and increased focus on rehabilitation for minor offences.
Focus on Rights & Safeguards All laws contain provisions for due process and fundamental rights. BNS and BNSS emphasise legal aid, community policing, and restorative justice mechanisms. Potential for better access to legal representation, community involvement in crime prevention, and victim reparation.
Technology Integration Existing laws lack comprehensive provisions for technology. BNS and BSB address cybercrimes, digital forensics, and electronic evidence handling. Aims to better address modern forms of crime and utilise technology for efficient investigations.

Challenges in New Criminal Law Reforms

  • Concerns Over Civil Liberties: Police custody durations: .One notable aspect of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS-II) is the significant extension of possible police custody durations.
    • This extension raises concerns about potential violations of civil liberties, as it expands the maximum limit from 15 days to either 60 or 90 days, depending on the nature of the offence.

  • Overcriminalization and Wider Police Powers: The proposed changes include expansive and vaguely defined offences, particularly those aimed at safeguarding the state’s security.
    • Terms like “Acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India” raise concerns about overcriminalization, providing law enforcement with wider powers that may impact civil liberties.
  • Ambiguous Offences Persist: While the term “sedition” has been removed, surrogate offences such as “Acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India” maintain wide and ambiguous wording.
    • Offences related to organised crime and terrorist acts have been introduced, with efforts made to clarify but leaving room for interpretation.
  • Structural Barriers and Infrastructural Challenges:

    • Infrastructural Shortcomings: Several positive aspects of the Bills depend on fundamental transformations in the criminal justice system. Emphasis on timelines and the expanded use of technology faces challenges related to high vacancies, an overburdened judiciary, and infrastructural shortcomings.
      • The mandatory involvement of forensic experts and audio-video technology necessitates significant developments in infrastructure, equipment, and personnel training.

Conclusion

India’s criminal laws have developed through centuries, shaped by indigenous legal customs, foreign intrusions, and colonial influences. The legal framework is in a constant state of evolution, adapting to contemporary challenges while safeguarding principles of justice, fairness, and human rights.

Reforms are integral to this process, ensuring the legal system remains responsive to the needs of a dynamic society. In this ongoing journey, India strives to reconcile historical influences with a commitment to uphold fundamental values in the pursuit of a just and equitable legal landscape.

MCQs

1. Which committee was constituted by the Ministry of Home Affairs to review the three codes of criminal law, and who headed this committee?

  1. Malimath Committee, headed by Dr. Ranbir Singh
  2. Ranbir Singh Committee, headed by Malimath
  3. Madhav Menon Committee, headed by Dr. Ranbir Singh
  4. Malimath Committee, headed by Madhav Menon

2. What is one of the challenges mentioned in the new bills regarding police custody durations?

  1. Reduction of maximum custody duration
  2. No change in maximum custody duration
  3. Extension of possible police custody durations
  4. Elimination of police custody provision

3. What is a potential concern associated with the proposed changes in offences related to state security in the new bills?

  1. Overcriminalization and wider police powers
  2. Strict definition and limitations
  3. Limited jurisdiction of law enforcement
  4. Decreased role of law enforcement in state security matters

Answers: 

1. C) Madhav Menon Committee, headed by Dr. Ranbir Singh

2. C) Extension of possible police custody durations

3. A) Overcriminalization and wider police powers

Must Read
NCERT Notes For UPSC UPSC Daily Current Affairs
UPSC Blogs UPSC Daily Editorials
Daily Current Affairs Quiz Daily Main Answer Writing
UPSC Mains Previous Year Papers UPSC Test Series 2024

 

Frequently Asked Questions

The bills are Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha (Second) Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya (Second) Bill.

They intend to replace the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and Indian Evidence Act (IEA) respectively, aiming for a comprehensive overhaul of India's criminal justice system

They call for "judicial discretion" for certain sensitive information, tighter electronic evidence standards, and tiered sentencing.

While some applaud the modernization efforts, others voice concerns regarding the possibility of power abuse, the weakening of existing safeguards, and ambiguous provisions.

The board of trustees was framed to survey the three codes of criminal regulation in India.

The Service of Home Undertakings gave a notice on May 4, 2020, comprising the board, and it was led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, the previous Bad habit Chancellor of Public Regulation College (NLU), Delhi.
/*
*/

Archive Calendar

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

by month

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

THE MOST
LEARNING PLATFORM

Learn From India's Best Faculty

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">







    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.