Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam: Promise of Women’s Reservation and the Delimitation Challenge

The 106th Constitutional Amendment Act (Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, 2023) was hailed as a milestone for gender justice, but Article 334A—linking its rollout to a future Census and Delimitation—has raised concerns over the timing and intent of the reform.

Best Online Coaching for UPSC

About the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, 2023

• Core Provision: Inserts Articles 330A and 332A to reserve one-third (33%) of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies.
• Vertical Integration: The 33% quota applies within the seats already reserved for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST).
• Duration: The reservation is initially set for 15 years, subject to extension by Parliament.
• Rotation: Seats reserved for women shall be rotated across constituencies after every delimitation exercise.

The “Unnecessary Linkage” (Article 334A)

The implementation of the Act is “held hostage” by two specific procedural conditions under Clause 334A:

• A Fresh Census: The reservation activates only after a Census is conducted post-commencement of the Act.
• Subsequent Delimitation: The redrawing of constituencies must then take place based on that Census data.
• Historical Contrast: The 108th Amendment Bill (2010), passed by the Rajya Sabha, had no such conditions. It offered an unconditional, immediate 33% quota, proving that a straightforward template for empowerment already existed.

Its Implications & Reality Check

• Declining Representation: Despite the Act’s passage, representation is stagnating. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the number of women MPs fell from 78 to 74 (13.6%).
• State-Level Crisis: In assembly elections across 10 states (2024–25), women won only 123 out of 1,276 seats (less than 10%).
• Political Gerrymandering: There are significant fears that redrawing boundaries will be used to restructure opposition strongholds, as seen in recent delimitation exercises in Assam (2023) and Jammu & Kashmir (2022).

UPSC Online Classes

Challenges & Concerns- The “Hidden Aims”

Critics argue that the linkage serves several politically convenient objectives:

• Evading Current Data: By using the 2011 Census or delaying the 2027 Census, the government avoids the complexities of migration and urbanization shifts that a fresh social audit would reveal.
• Dodging the Caste Census: A fresh Census would inevitably trigger demands for caste-based data. Linking women’s reservation to the Census allows the government to postpone this politically sensitive discussion.
• The SC/ST “Double Disadvantage”: Delimitation based on outdated data denies SC/ST communities their rightful share of increased seats based on current population proportions. This has been labeled as “Manuvadi Injustice,” as it prevents SC/ST women from accessing a larger pool of reserved seats.

Way Forward

• Delink the Reservation: The core demand is to Amend Clause 334A. Women’s reservation should be a stand-alone commitment, not chained to the Census or Delimitation.
• Immediate Activation: The 33% quota should be applied to the existing 543 Lok Sabha seats immediately. If Parliament expands to 850 seats later, the rule can auto-apply to the new total.
• Transparency in Delimitation: Any future redrawing of boundaries must be handled by a truly neutral commission to prevent gerrymandering and ensure the moral shield of women’s reservation is not misused for partisan gains.

Click to Explore UPSC Offline Coaching

Conclusion

The progress of a community is measured by the progress of its women. As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar stated, the delay in implementing this reservation is not merely a technicality but a test of constitutional sincerity. Real empowerment requires immediate action, not procedural postponement.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store

DOWNLOAD PDF