//php print_r(get_the_ID()); ?>
The Akal Takht has recently imposed a religious and political punishment on Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader Sukhbir Singh Badal and his colleagues. This decision has raised concerns about the growing intersection between religious authority and political affairs, leading to a disturbing blurring of lines between faith and politics.
Akal Takht is the highest Sikh temporal seat making it the final word on the affairs of the community. Any person who identifies as a Sikh can be summoned to the Akal Takht, tried, and sentenced. |
---|
While the Akal Takht has the right to oversee religious matters within the Sikh community, its intervention in political decisions is deeply problematic. India’s secular principles must be upheld, and the separation of religious and political spheres should be maintained to ensure a healthy democratic system.
Another Case
A sitting judge, Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court, brazenly challenges both the spirit and letter of the Constitution of India. While opposition members in Parliament have initiated an impeachment motion, and the Supreme Court of India has called for a report, the gravity of the situation cannot be overstated. The fact that a sitting judge can make such incendiary remarks in a public forum is itself a clear sign that the barrier between judicial speech and political speech has been breached. The ‘We’ in the Preamble of the Constitution is not a homogenous group defined by religion, but a diverse and plural collective that transcends narrow sectarian boundaries. We, the citizens of India, have a responsibility to protect the integrity of the Constitution and to ensure that no individual, regardless of their position, is allowed to undermine it. |
---|
Mains Practice |
---|
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
<div class="new-fform">
</div>