The Competition Commission of India (CCI) recently took action against Meta, highlighting the growing scrutiny of data exploitation and anti-competitive behavior

CCI’s Order Against Big Tech Giants

• Penalty: On November 18, 2024, a ₹213.14 crore fine was imposed, along with a five-year ban on WhatsApp from sharing user data with Meta-owned platforms like Facebook and Instagram for advertising purposes.
• Appeal by Meta: Meta challenged the CCI’s order before the NCLAT, which on January 23, 2025, granted interim relief, staying both the five-year ban and the ₹213.14 crore penalty, conditional on Meta depositing 50% of the penalty amount.
• CCI’s Findings: WhatsApp’s update forced users to consent to expanded data-sharing on a “take-it-or-leave-it” basis. This move reinforced Meta’s dominance in OTT messaging & online display advertising markets in India.
• Anti-competitive concerns: Strengthened Meta’s market power. Gave an unfair advantage in digital advertising. Restricted competition, making it harder for rivals to compete.
• Action Against Google: In 2022, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposed a ₹1,337.76 crore penalty on Google for abuse of dominance across multiple markets, including Android OS licensing, app stores, web browsers, online search, and video hosting platforms. 
  • Google was found guilty of forcing pre-installation of its apps on Android devices. In 2023, the NCLAT upheld the verdict, affirming Google’s anti-competitive conduct.

Role of Data in Digital Markets

• Usage: Data is the new oil, but unlike oil, it has limitless utility—it can be collected, analyzed, and reused indefinitely.
• Dominance: In digital markets, data serves as both the source and enabler of dominance, creating sustained competitive advantages.
• Role of Tech giants: Tech giants like Meta leverage massive user data pools to refine algorithms for better engagement, enable hyper-targeted advertising to boost revenue, and create personalized experiences that enhance user retention.
• Market Entrenchment: More users → More data → Better services → Even more users. These self-reinforcing cycles deter new competition, locking consumers into ecosystems controlled by dominant players.

International Scrutiny on Meta and Google

• United States: The Majority Staff Report on ‘Competition in Digital Markets’ (U.S. House Judiciary Committee) emphasizes the need to reform antitrust laws to counter Big Tech’s unprecedented market power.
• Meta’s Antitrust Lawsuits: Accused of anti-competitive acquisitions (Instagram & WhatsApp). Alleged to have erected entry barriers for emerging competitors.
• Google’s Legal Challenges: In 2024, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia found Google guilty of violating the Sherman Act due to exclusive agreements in search and advertising markets.
• Europe: Meta abused its dominance by combining user data without explicit consent, violating EU competition law & GDPR.
• Antitrust Actions Big Tech: Meta’s ad-supported subscription model under scrutiny. Google fined over €8 billion across multiple cases for anti-competitive practices in mobile OS & app markets.
• Australia: Implemented tougher digital platform regulations to address market dominance.

Past Antitrust Cases

• AT&T (U.S.): Forced to divest 22 operating companies to break its telecom monopoly.
• Microsoft (U.S.): Subject to oversight & API access regulations to prevent anti-competitive practices.

Strengthening India’s Laws

• Limitations of the Competition Act, 2002: Lacks provisions to regulate data-centric monopolies. Focuses on price-based dominance, whereas digital markets rely on data aggregation and network effects.
• Redefining Key Terms: Update definitions of ‘market power’ and ‘dominant position’ to reflect digital market realities.
• Recognizing Data Monopolization: Introduce data control as a critical factor in assessing dominance.
• Interoperability & Data Sharing: Prevent monopolies by requiring tech platforms to share data in a regulated manner.
• Integration: Align competition law with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 for a coordinated regulatory approach. 
  • Inspired by the EU model (DMA + GDPR), India can establish a holistic framework to combat data exploitation and monopolistic practices.

Conclusion

However, the pattern of legal battles across jurisdictions suggests that piecemeal regulatory efforts may not be enough. A comprehensive, globally harmonized regulatory framework is needed to effectively curb data exploitation & monopolistic control.

DOWNLOAD PDF