The Justice K. Hema Committee report, publicly released by the Kerala government on August 19, 2024, has sparked a significant debate about the challenges faced by women in the Malayalam film industry.
- Justice K. Hema Committee Report:
- Background: The committee was established in 2017 in response to the sexual assault of a Malayalam film actress. The report, submitted in 2019, focuses on the various issues faced by women within the Malayalam film industry.
- Public Access: A redacted version of the report is now publicly available.
- Scope: While the report specifically addresses issues within the Malayalam film industry, the problems are widespread and affect the broader entertainment industry.
Enroll now for UPSC Online Course
Key Issues highlighted by the Hema Committee report
- Sexual Exploitation: Women in the industry are reportedly pressured to exchange sexual favors for career opportunities. Those who refuse are often sidelined by powerful figures.
- Discriminatory Practices: The Hema Committee report also notes widespread discrimination against women and the lack of basic facilities. It highlights a systemic issue of gender inequality in the workplace.
- Broader Implications
- Gender Equality: The report underscores a critical lack of gender equality in the workplace, highlighting the need for systemic change.
- Reinforcing the Conversation: The recent brutal incident of a doctor’s rape and murder in Kolkata further emphasizes the urgent need for discussions on gender-based violence and workplace safety.
Culture of Assault
- Disturbing but Not Surprising: The issues raised in the Hema Committee report reflect deeper problems within a conservative, patriarchal society.
- Stereotypes and Expectations: Women face societal expectations and stereotypes that influence their behavior and choices, contributing to a culture where sexual assault is seen as an isolated issue rather than a systemic problem.
- Consent and Autonomy: Sexual assault should be viewed not just as an act by an individual but as a result of societal norms that disregard women’s consent and autonomy.
- Individualistic Approach: A focus on individual behavior often distracts from the systemic nature of sexual assault, where objectification and gender stereotypes play a significant role.
- Statistics: In 2022, there were 31,516 reported rape cases in India, equating to one reported case every 16 minutes. Workplace harassment is also a reflection of this pervasive issue.
Legal and Institutional Responses
- Vishaka Guidelines (1997): The Supreme Court of India introduced guidelines to prevent workplace harassment, requiring employers to set up complaint redress mechanisms.
- Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013: This legislation established the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) for addressing workplace harassment, with a broad definition of “workplace” including industries like film-making.
Check Out UPSC Modules From PW Store
Challenges and Recommendations
- Limitations of ICC: The Hema Committee report suggests that the ICC may not be effective in the film industry due to potential influence by abusers or employers.
- Need for Independent Forums: The report advocates for an independent government-constituted forum to address issues in the film industry specifically. However, this suggestion faces challenges and may overlook the benefits of existing parliamentary legislation.
Registration of Crimes
- Lack of Investigation: There is concern about why crimes identified by the Hema Committee report have not led to formal investigations or prosecution. The committee’s report has redacted the names of survivors and accused individuals. This protects survivor anonymity, a standard practice in sexual assault cases.
- Survivor Anonymity: The Supreme Court in Nipun Saxena vs. Union Of India (2018) reinforced the importance of protecting survivor anonymity under Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code and similar provisions in the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita. This protection aims to prevent hostile discrimination and future harassment.
- Right to Privacy: Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees the right to privacy, including the protection of the identity of sexual assault survivors.
- Victim’s Role and Challenges:
- Victim’s Choice: Victims have the right to decide whether to pursue legal action. However, the effectiveness of prosecution often depends on the victim’s cooperation.
- Reluctance to Complain: Survivors may be reluctant to report assaults due to societal stigma, fear of retaliation, and the protracted nature of legal proceedings. Trials in sexual assault cases can be lengthy due to judicial delays.
- Societal and Systemic Issues:
- Misguided Empathy: Societal attitudes that view survivors with pity or disgust, rather than support, discourage reporting and perpetuate the status quo.
- Retaliation Fears: Survivors may face retaliation, including professional repercussions or being labeled as troublemakers, which further deters them from pursuing complaints.
- Context of the Hema Committee:
- Formation and Background: The committee was established following a high-profile sexual assault case in the Malayalam film industry, which remains unresolved.
Enroll now for UPSC Online Classes
Conclusion
The Hema Committee report highlights systemic issues of sexual exploitation and discrimination in the Malayalam film industry, revealing broader societal challenges. Survivor anonymity and reluctance to report crimes are significant obstacles, compounded by slow legal processes and societal stigma. Addressing these issues requires a proactive, supportive approach that ensures protection and accountability for survivors.
August 26, 2024
