While India’s GDP growth is robust on paper, it masks a stark reality: economic output is concentrated in a handful of districts, leaving vast regions underdeveloped. To ensure inclusive growth, development must be district-led and data-driven.

Concentrated Prosperity: The District Divide

• Regional Economic Concentration: Economic activity is highly concentrated in a few districts across states.
  • Uttarakhand Imbalance: Just 3 districts account for 71% of the GSDP.
  • Karnataka Disparity: Bengaluru alone contributes 38%, while the next highest district contributes only 5.5%.
  • Maharashtra Dominance: Mumbai, Thane, Pune, and Nagpur together generate over 60% of the state’s GSDP.
  • Madhya Pradesh Gap: Indore contributes 6.7%, while the average district contributes just 2–3%.
• Top Districts’ Share: The top 10% of districts often generate 50–60% of a state’s economic output.

Impact of Economic Concentration

• Urban Migration Pressures: Economic imbalances lead to mass migration to urban centres, causing housing pressure, rise in informal jobs, and infrastructure stress.
• Neglect of Backward Districts: Neglected districts experience poor human capital, low investment, and persistent underdevelopment.
• Policy Blind Spots: Aggregated GDP figures obscure intra-state inequalities, resulting in misdirected policy interventions.

Limits of DDP Estimation

• Estimation vs. Measurement: In many cases, district GDP is estimated, not accurately measured, leading to data inaccuracies.
• Economic Shifts Ignored: Use of outdated extrapolations fails to capture structural changes, such as Bengaluru’s tech boom.
• Undercounted Informal Sector: Informal and unincorporated sectors, which dominate rural economies, are underreported due to the lack of comprehensive surveys.
• Policy Consequences: These data gaps cause policymakers to misjudge both regional disparities and actual growth patterns.

The Case for District-Led Development

• Decentralised Planning: Shift focus from state to district as the primary unit for economic planning and development.
• Economic Measurement: Conduct annual, primary-data-based assessments of district economies.
• Sectoral GVA Tracking: Collect Gross Value Added (GVA) data across agriculture, manufacturing, services, and unincorporated sectors.
• Local Labour Insights: Carry out regular labour force surveys and map informal enterprises at the district level.
• Real-Time Monitoring: Implement real-time dashboards to track growth, employment, and productivity dynamically.
• Tailored Growth Plans: Design sector-specific district development plans, leveraging local resources and demographic profiles.
• Incentivised Funding: Link central funding to the quality of district-level data and planning performance.

Conclusion

India’s economic success must not rest on a few urban hubs. For truly inclusive and sustainable development, all 806 districts must become engines of growth. This requires not only good intent but also granular, real-time economic data and district-level planning rooted in ground realities.

DOWNLOAD PDF