As 2026 begins, China presents a complex picture of economic strain combined with renewed strategic confidence, while U.S. policy recalibration has altered great-power dynamics.
- These shifts have narrowed India’s strategic space and complicated the management of its already strained relationship with China.
China–India Relations 2026: Shifting Mood in China
- Anxiety to Assertiveness: Until late 2024, Chinese Track 2 dialogues reflected anxiety over U.S. containment and economic slowdown. By mid-2025, confidence — at times bordering on hubris — dominated Beijing’s strategic community.
- Sources of Renewed Confidence: Belief in gaining ground in U.S.–China competition, Perception of effective escalation management, Tactical gains in trade and tariff disputes, Deepening alignment with Russia, Stabilisation of significant relationships, except with Japan.
- Sun Tzu’s Strategy: Following the philosophy of Sun Tzu, China aims to appear strong when it is actually weak. The current display of confidence is a technique used to mask internal economic fragility.
The Reality of the Chinese Economy
- Growth Figures: While 2025 growth is cited at 5%, the actual figure is lower.
- Domestic Issues: Internal demand is described as “dead,” the property sector has collapsed, and the country has faced 38 consecutive months of deflation (negative producer prices).
- The economy is facing sluggish productivity and weak corporate profits.
- Fiscal stress among local governments is limiting the options for stimulus.
Xi Jinping’s Master Plan (October 2025)
- Shift in Focus: Moving away from consumer-led growth, the plan focuses on National Security and high-end technology.
- Priority Sectors: Massive investment in semiconductors, AI, and green energy.
- State-Led Model: The government, rather than the market, is the primary driver of capital
China Shock “2.0”
- Export Surplus: Because domestic demand is low, China is flooding global markets with goods, leading to a trade surplus exceeding $1 trillion.
- Global Impact: Cheap Electric Vehicles (EVs), solar panels, and batteries are being exported at prices that threaten to shut down factories in other nations.
- IMF Warning: The IMF has issued indirect warnings that the world may stop trading with China if this dumping continues.
Trump 2.0 and the “G2” Relationship
- Shift in US Policy: Under Trump’s second term, China is viewed as an economic competitor rather than just a systemic rival.
- Transactional Bargaining: A meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping in Busan (October 2025) led to a “G2” agreement—a transactional deal to lower tariffs.
Implications for India
- Economic Dependency: India faces a $110 billion trade deficit with China and relies on it for medicines, electronics, and rare-earth magnets.
- Strategic Risk: If the US and China reach a “G2” deal, India risks being sidelined as a counterweight.
Border and “Grey Zone” Tactics
- Cautious Stabilisation: The border is “stable” (no active firing) but not “normal”.
- Salami Slicing: China has effectively stopped Indian patrolling in certain buffer zones, turning them into “No Man’s Land,” which is viewed as a tactical win for China.
- Infrastructure: China is building a massive dam in Tibet near the border despite Indian concerns.
- Psychological Warfare: China continues to rename places in Arunachal Pradesh as part of its “Grey Zone” tactics.
The Two-Ocean Strategy and Debt Traps
- Naval Presence: The presence of Chinese warships and submarines in the Indian Ocean has become normalised.
- Financial Control: China uses a “Debt Trap” strategy, likened to a local moneylender trapping a farmer, to bring Global South nations under its influence.
Way Forward for India
- Strategic Patience: Maintain vigilance while exercising patience in diplomatic and security engagements.
- Asymmetric Deterrence: Focus on missiles, drones, and cost-imposing capabilities rather than conventional parity with China.
- Internal Strength: Achieve technological self-reliance to reduce dependence on Chinese minerals and medicines, strengthening national security and resilience.
Conclusion
Although external partnerships remain important, their reliability cannot be assumed amid tactical U.S.–China accommodations; India must therefore focus on internal strength, resilience, and strategic patience to meet long-term challenges.