India’s evacuation of citizens from West Asia highlights a strong crisis response but underscores the need for comprehensive migration governance beyond emergencies.
- India still tends to engage with migration mainly during crises, rather than governing the entire migration cycle — recruitment, mobility, work conditions, welfare, and return.
Best Online Coaching for UPSC
Gulf Region: Central to India’s Migration Economy
- Major destination for Indian migrants: The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries host nearly 99.35 lakh Indians (December 2025), making the region one of the largest destinations for India’s overseas workforce.
- Key source of remittances: The Gulf accounts for about 37.9% of India’s total remittance inflows (2023–24).
- Economic vulnerability to regional instability: Any political or security instability in West Asia can directly affect Indian households, district-level economies, and state welfare systems.
Fragile and Thinly Institutionalised Migration Chains
- Weakly institutionalised migration networks: India’s internal and international migration systems rely on informal, loosely regulated networks of recruiters, contractors, and intermediaries, making them structurally fragile.
- Lessons from the COVID-19 crisis: The pandemic exposed these weaknesses when millions of migrant workers were stranded, highlighting the lack of adequate institutional support and social protection.
- Growing economic pressures on migrants: Rising living costs, LPG price increases, tightening labour conditions, and sectoral slowdowns are gradually undermining the stability of migrant workers.
- Invisible accumulation of risks: These pressures build up quietly and often remain unnoticed by policymakers, becoming visible only when major disruptions or crises occur.
Fragmented Institutional Architecture
- Multiple ministries involved: Migration governance is divided among different institutions:
- Ministry of External Affairs -emigration clearance and diplomacy,
- Ministry of Labour and Employment – labour welfare and recruitment regulation, and
- State governments– skilling and welfare schemes.
- Institution–Migration Mismatch: A migrant’s journey spans source districts, recruitment networks, international labour markets, and return migration, cutting across administrative jurisdictions.
- Partial institutional visibility: As responsibilities are fragmented, migrant workers remain visible to individual agencies but rarely to the system as a whole, weakening coordinated governance and policy response.
Data Deficit and Governance Blind Spots
- Lack of migration data: India lacks real-time, detailed data on migrant workers, limiting the government’s ability to anticipate migration trends and risks.
- Administrative gap in normal times: In routine conditions, this data deficit creates policy blind spots in planning welfare, labour protection, and migration management.
- Major challenge during crises: During disruptions, the absence of reliable data makes it difficult for governments to track migrants, assess their conditions, and manage return and rehabilitation effectively.
Click to Explore UPSC Offline Coaching
Proposed Solutions and Models
- Kerala model of migration governance: Kerala has institutionalised migrant welfare through the Non-Resident Keralites Affairs Department, a dedicated body with authority and staff to support overseas workers.
- Legislative framework for mobility: The proposed Overseas Mobility Facilitation and Welfare Bill aims to create a structured system for managing overseas worker mobility and ensuring their welfare.
- Anticipatory governance approach: A “whole-of-the-journey” model is proposed to track migrants from departure to employment abroad and eventual return, supported by a single institutional helpline or entry point for assistance.
Conclusion
India must shift from reactive evacuation-based responses to anticipatory, institutionally coordinated migration governance that protects workers throughout their migration journey.