On India’s ‘One Nation, One Subscription’ Plan

PWOnlyIAS

November 30, 2024

On India’s ‘One Nation, One Subscription’ Plan

India’s ‘One Nation, One Subscription’ (ONOS) initiative aims to enhance research accessibility by negotiating a single subscription for government-funded institutions.

Background

  • Research journals charge hefty fees to both readers and research institutes, making it difficult for many institutions, especially those in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, to provide students with quality research material. 
  • This hampers their studies and limits access to critical research. Even institutions in Tier 1 cities have faced challenges, despite negotiating lower rates by forming consortia with publishers, as the fees remained prohibitively high. 
  • Under the ONOS plan, the government will now directly negotiate with publishers, ensuring that all students in government-funded institutes have equal access to research materials.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Classes

Advantages of ONOS

  • Improved Access to Journals: Expensive journals will now be accessible to government-funded institutes, addressing the issue of unequal access to academic papers.
  • Centralized Negotiations: With the government at the helm, the ONOS plan simplifies the process, offering a unified subscription fee that could benefit a wider range of institutions.
  • Better research and innovation: Broader access to scholarly articles and resources fosters a more robust research environment, driving innovation and academic excellence in various fields.

Limitations and Concerns of ONOS

  • Exclusivity: ONOS will only apply to publicly funded institutions, leaving private universities and other researchers without access to the benefits.
  • Continued Dependence on Publishers: Despite being publicly funded, much research remains behind paywalls, forcing the public to pay twice: first through taxes funding the research, and again via subscription fees for access. 
    • This system sustains private publishers’ profits at the expense of equitable public access.
  • Allocation of Funds: The government’s allocation of ₹6,000 crore over three years to pay major publishers raises concerns, particularly given India’s stagnant R&D expenditure as a percentage of GDP, highlighting the strain on already limited research funding.             
  • Addressing Predatory Publishers and Pricing: Predatory publishers exploit researchers by charging excessive fees to publish low-quality or fraudulent studies, undermining academic integrity. 
    • Addressing this issue is crucial to ensure ethical publishing and protect the credibility of research.
  • Lack of Transparency and Flexibility: There are concerns about the transparency of ONOS, including the list of journals that will be included, and whether irrelevant or low-quality journals will be removed or new, emerging journals will be added.
  • Overlooking Modern Publishing Trends: The rise of ‘gold’ open-access, where authors pay to publish and papers are freely accessible, and the increasing popularity of preprints (early-stage research papers) make the ONOS strategy less appealing in its current form.

Alternative Models 

  • Open-Access Models: The government could have supported ‘green’ or ‘diamond’ open-access models that allow free public access to research by default, or promoted home-grown journals that cater to the specific needs of Indian scholars.
    • Green Open-Access Model: Researchers self-archive a version of their paper in a public repository or university website, making it available to all after an embargo period.
    • Diamond Open-Access Model: Publishers provide free access to both readers and authors, with no fees for publication or subscription, often supported by institutions or grants.

India should have advocated for a change in the current research publishing model, as it is a significant issue for most developing countries. By pushing for open-access models, India can ensure equitable access to publicly funded research, benefiting scholars and institutions across the nation.

Check Out UPSC NCERT Textbooks From PW Store

Conclusion

The ONOS plan has the potential to improve access to research for underfunded government institutes, promoting wider knowledge dissemination. However, a shift towards more sustainable open-access models and greater transparency is essential for a truly equitable and innovative academic environment.

Mains Question:

Q. “One Nation, One Subscription” (ONOS) plan has the potential to improve public access to research but also raises concerns about long-term sustainability and inclusivity.” Discuss the merits and limitations of ONOS in this context. (15 M, 250 words)

To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

/*
*/

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

To Download Toppers Copies: Click here

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">






    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.