Why India’s Tourism Sector Needs A Regulatory Rethink

Why India’s Tourism Sector Needs A Regulatory Rethink 19 Dec 2025

Why India’s Tourism Sector Needs A Regulatory Rethink

Experts like Amitabh Kant argue that India’s tourism potential is hindered by “Regulatory Density” and a lack of competitiveness.

Tourism Potential

  • Rich Natural and Cultural Assets: India possesses monuments, mountains, beaches, and cuisine that make it one of the world’s richest travel destinations.
  • Employment and Revenue Opportunity: Tourism has the potential to become a $1-trillion industry and generate 50 million jobs in the next decade.
  • Extensive Natural Endowments: India’s coastline is three times longer than Thailand’s, and its national park area is twice that of Kenya.
  • Low Foreign Tourist Arrivals: Despite these advantages, India attracts only about 10 million foreign tourists annually.

Key Constraints For the Development of the Tourism Sector

  • High Cost of Tourism Services: Four-star beach hotels in Goa cost ₹12,000–₹15,000 per night, while comparable properties in Phuket or Da Nang cost about half as much.
  • Excessive Regulatory Density: Tourism entrepreneurs face dozens of permission requirements, high excise charges, and lengthy approval processes.
    • Hotels require around 50 clearances, restaurants about 30, and even small operators need multiple NOCs.
  • Long Project Timelines: Tourism projects take up to three years to complete approvals, compared to 18 months in Southeast Asia.
  • Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Restrictions: CRZ norms restrict construction within 200–500 metres of the high-tide line without distinguishing eco-resorts from large hotels.
  • Monument Protection Constraints: The Ancient Monument and Archaeological Sites Remains (AMASR) Act blocks or limits development within 100-300 metres of protected monuments, regardless of scale or design.
  • Uniform Environmental Clearances: Forest, wildlife, and environmental procedures apply equally to small lodges and large industrial projects.
    • Regulatory frameworks have rendered locations such as the Ganga riverbanks, Konkan beaches, Kerala backwaters, and tiger reserves largely inaccessible to sustainable investment.

International Comparisons- Balanced Conservation Approach

  • Thailand’s Green Tourism Model: Thailand permits eco-resorts under its Green Tourism certification system.
  • Vietnam’s Low-Density Coastal Development: Vietnam allows low-density beachfront development with strict waste-management norms.
  • Sri Lanka’s Risk-Based Coastal Zoning: Sri Lanka zones coastal development based on elevation and flood risk.

Way Forward

  • Shift from Regulation to Facilitation: States must move from regulation to facilitation through mission-mode execution.
  • Rationalisation of Licences: At least 10 licences should be simplified, six scrapped, and 10 merged as per the Atithi Foundation report.
    • Example: Eating House and Health Trade licences duplicating FSSAI approval should be eliminated.
  • Unified Municipal Licence: A Unified Municipal Licence should replace multiple trade licences for hospitality establishments.
  • Risk-Based Fire Safety Approvals: States should issue provisional NoCs within 7 days for low-risk units and make full certificates valid for 5-10 years, using accredited third parties to expand capacity and curb delays.
  • Rationalise Pollution Classification: Pollution categories should be updated so that clean, solar-powered hotels that use LPG and practice proper waste management are classified as “green” or “white,” rather than treated as highly polluting “orange” or “red” industries.
  • Expansion of Homestay Capacity: Homestay room limits should be increased to eight, and owner-residency requirements should be removed, while maintaining safety norms.
    • Small homestays should not require separate NOCs from multiple departments.
  • Regulated Access for Tourist Transport: Private tourist buses should be allowed regulated access to government-owned Inter-State Bus Terminals (ISBTs).
  • Uniform Implementation of Tourist Permits: The All India Tourist Permit should be uniformly implemented across states.
    • Harmonisation will boost inter-state circuits and lower costs.
  • Single-Window Approval for Adventure Tourism: A single online portal should integrate approvals for adventure and water-based tourism.
  • Competitive Federalism in Tourism Reform: Tourism is a state subject, which means reform can thrive through competitive federalism.
    • States such as Goa, Himachal Pradesh, and Rajasthan have already piloted unified hospitality licences and online single-window clearances.
    • Other states can go further by introducing automatic renewals, waiving fees for micro-operators, and digitising all approvals.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store
online store 1

Conclusion

Tourism growth requires deregulation. Entrepreneurs are ready, and governments must clear the way to boost investment, jobs, and global recognition.

Mains Practice

Q. Despite vast tourism potential, India underperforms globally. Examine how regulatory barriers constrain tourism growth and suggest reforms to improve competitiveness. (10 Marks, 150 Words)

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">







    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.