Recently, a controversy has emerged over the utilisation of MPLADS funds, highlighting concerns related to transparency and accountability.
About MPLADS Funds
- Launch and Oversight: MPLADS is a Central Sector Scheme launched in December 1993 to enable Members of Parliament to recommend local developmental works.
- Initially managed by the Ministry of Rural Development, it is now under the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI).
- Financial Allocation: Each MP is entitled to recommend works worth ₹5 crore annually, primarily within their own constituency.
- Non-Lapsable Funds: The funds are non-lapsable; if an MP does not spend the full amount in one year, the remainder carries over to the following year’s budget.
- Role of the MP vs. Executive: The MP only makes recommendations for projects.
- The actual execution, management, and signing of cheques are the responsibility of the District Magistrate (DM) or Collector.
Recent Controversy- Fund Diversion
- A political controversy arose after the ruling party alleged misuse of MPLADS funds by three opposition MPs from Rajasthan, claiming that allocations outside their constituencies diluted the scheme’s core objective.
Performance Analysis and Fund Utilisation under MPLADS
- Constitutional and Administrative Criticism: Despite persistent concerns about corruption and perceived violations of the doctrine of separation of powers, MPLADS continues to show strong utilisation outcomes.
- 14th Lok Sabha (2004–2009): During the 14th Lok Sabha, nearly 99% of MPLADS funds were utilised, with only about 1% remaining unused.
- 15th Lok Sabha (2009–2014): In the 15th Lok Sabha, fund utilisation remained high, with only 3.4% of the allocated funds left unspent.
- 16th Lok Sabha (2014–2019): The 16th Lok Sabha witnessed a modest decline in utilisation efficiency, with 8.7% of MPLADS funds remaining unused, yet overall absorption stayed substantial.
- 17th Lok Sabha (2019–2024): Approximately 75% of MPLADS funds were utilised, with lower utilisation largely explained by the two-year suspension of the scheme during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- 18th Lok Sabha (Ongoing): In the early phase of the 18th Lok Sabha, ₹5,486 crore has been allocated, of which ₹1,453 crore is currently under implementation, indicating execution in progress rather than underperformance.
Case Studies of Success
- Sant Balbir Singh Sechewal: Focused on environmental ecology and solving water scarcity in villages.
- Iqra Choudhary: Established a model for transparency by maintaining updated profiles and providing geo-tagged images of completed works for public verification.
- Tejasvi Surya: Prioritised education and urban infrastructure development.
- Abhishek Banerjee: Demonstrated high efficiency by completing the highest number of projects (173).
Way Forward
- Training & Workshops: MPs should be trained to use funds effectively and engage professional consultants. Structured capacity-building workshops should be organised to guide MPs on project planning and prioritisation.
- Enhanced Monitoring: Transparency mechanisms such as geotagging, dashboards and public disclosure should be strengthened to enhance accountability.
- Social Audits: Allowing local citizens to audit how the ₹5 crore is spent to prevent corruption.
Conclusion
The current MPLADS controversy reflects political contestation rather than a breakdown of policy design. When implemented within the rules and supported by oversight, MPLADS remains a valuable instrument for grassroots development and democratic accountability.