Myanmar’s 2025–26 Elections: Military Rule, Civil War and India’s Strategic Dilemma

Five years after the 2021 military coup, Myanmar conducted phased elections in late 2025–early 2026.

Background of the Political Crisis

• The 2021 Coup: On 1 February 2021, the Myanmar military seized power, ousting the democratically elected government.
• Imprisonment of Leaders: Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi and many leaders of the National League for Democracy (NLD) were jailed.
• Manufactured Legitimacy: The elections, conducted in three phases, are described as attempts to artificially project political legitimacy rather than to reflect genuine democratic consent.
• Limited Participation: Voting occurred in only 265 of 330 towns. Polling was largely confined to urban wards, as most rural areas remained under the resistance influence.
  • Restricted voting across limited townships and controlled political participation ensured the victory of the military’s political wing, the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP).
• Declining Turnout: Turnout fell to 55% (down from 70% in previous elections).
• Banned Opposition: Major parties such as the National League for Democracy (NLD), Arakan National Party, and Shan Nationalities League for Democracy were dissolved.

Explore Combo (GS+Optional) Courses

Explore Combo (GS+Optional) Courses

The Reality of Civil War and “Fragmented Sovereignty”

• Human Cost: The ongoing civil war has resulted in nearly 8,000 deaths (including civilians and journalists) and the destruction of 113,000 homes.
• Resistance Movements: The People’s Defence Forces (PDF) and various ethnic armies have risen against the junta.
• Loss of Control: Resistance groups now control approximately 91 towns, resulting in a state of “fragmented sovereignty” in which the military government effectively rules only major cities and the capital.

India’s Strategic Bind: Principles vs. Pragmatism

• The Democratic Dilemma: As the world’s largest democracy, India feels pressured to support democratic transitions, yet it cannot afford to alienate the junta.
  • Myanmar is both a strategic neighbour and a gateway to Southeast Asia, crucial for its Act East Policy.
• The China Factor: Pushing the military government away could drive Myanmar closer to China, with which it already shares close ties.
• Internal Security: India relies on the Myanmar military to cooperate in controlling insurgency in the North-East. If relations sour, Indian insurgents could find a safe haven in Myanmar with junta support.
• Refugee Crisis: India shares a 1,643 km border with Myanmar. Currently, over 90,000 refugees have entered states like Mizoram and Manipur.
• Strained Resources: The lack of a national refugee policy has placed the entire burden on state governments, heightening ethnic tensions in the border regions.
• Stalled Projects: Major connectivity initiatives, such as the Kaladan Multi-modal project and the India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway, remain stalled due to the prevailing security instability.

Transnational Crime and “Cyber Slavery”

• Lawlessness: The weakening of central authority has turned Myanmar into a hub for narcotics smuggling and online scams.
• The Scam Centres: Myanmar has become a global scam centre for digital arrests and human trafficking.
• Indian Victims: Since 2022, over 2,000 Indians have been rescued from cyber slavery, a new form of human trafficking where individuals are forced to conduct online scams

India’s Policy of Constructive Engagement

• Balanced Diplomacy: India has adopted a balanced approach, expressing support for democratic transition without officially rejecting the election results.
• High-Level Dialogue: In August 2025, Prime Minister Modi met with Senior General Min Aung Hlaing at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit to discuss bilateral issues and urged the holding of inclusive elections.
• Humanitarian Aid: Operation Brahma was a significant initiative by India to provide earthquake relief and field hospitals to Myanmar following the devastating 2025 earthquake

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store

Conclusion

India should pursue constructive, multi-track engagement, balancing limited interaction with the regime while maintaining channels with resistance groups to safeguard long-term interests.

DOWNLOAD PDF