Pakistan on Thursday suspended the 1972 Simla Agreement as a reaction against stringent measures taken by India amid nationwide grief over the terrorist attack in Pahalgam. 

Simla Agreement

• About: It was a significant peace treaty signed between the two countries after the 1971 Indo-Pakistani war. Earlier, India had suspended the Indus Waters Treaty between the two nations. 
• Aim: Signed on July 2, 1972, in the aftermath of the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, the Simla Agreement was aimed at restoring peace and normalising relations between India and Pakistan. The war had resulted in the secession of East Pakistan and the creation of the independent nation of Bangladesh, following India’s intervention
• Signatories: The treaty, signed in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, was inked by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and Pakistani President Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. 
  • It was a significant diplomatic milestone, setting the tone for post-war reconciliation and outlining key principles to guide future interactions.
• Official Decalaration: “The Government of India and the Government of Pakistan are resolved that the two countries put an end to the conflict and confrontation that have hitherto marred their relations and work for the promotion of a friendly and harmonious relationship 
  • And the establishment of durable peace in the sub-continent, so that both countries may henceforth devote their resources and energies to the pressing task of advancing the welfare of their peoples,” the official statement read. 

Key Agreements

• UN Charter Principles: Relations shall be governed by the Charter of the United Nations.
• Peaceful Resolution: Disputes to be settled through bilateral negotiations or mutually agreed peaceful means.
• Status Quo Maintenance: Neither side shall unilaterally alter the situation pending final settlement.
• Peaceful Coexistence: Commitment to respect territorial integrity, sovereignty, and non-interference.
• Resolution of Conflicts: Issues causing conflict to be resolved by peaceful means.
• Respect for Sovereignty: Respect for each other’s national unity, territorial integrity, political independence, and sovereign equality.
• Non-use of Force: Refrain from threat or use of force against each other’s territorial or political independence.

Outcomes of the Simla Agreement

• Peaceful Bilateral Resolution: Both nations committed to resolving disputes bilaterally, without third-party mediation.  India has consistently invoked this clause to oppose international interference, especially regarding Kashmir.
• Establishment of the Line of Control (LoC): The agreement converted the 1971 ceasefire line into the LoC, establishing a de facto border in Jammu and Kashmir.
  Both sides agreed not to alter this line unilaterally, thereby reinforcing the status quo.
• Return of Territory: India returned over 13,000 km² of land captured during the war, demonstrating goodwill and commitment to peace, while retaining strategic zones like Turtuk and Chalunka in the Chorbat Valley.
• Recognition of Bangladesh: Although not immediate, the agreement paved the way for Pakistan’s eventual diplomatic recognition of Bangladesh

Significance of the Suspension

• Current Strained Relations: The suspension comes amid already strained India-Pakistan relations, particularly after India’s abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019, which revoked Jammu and Kashmir’s special status. 
  • Pakistan has downgraded diplomatic ties and repeatedly internationalised the Kashmir issue, contrary to the bilateral approach prescribed in the Simla Agreement.
    
• Strategic Shift The suspension signals a possible strategic shift, where Pakistan may now seek third-party involvement (e.g., United Nations, China, or Organisation of Islamic Cooperation) and Internationalise the Kashmir conflict, contravening the Simla framework.
• Impact on LOC: The LoC, a frequent flashpoint between India and Pakistan, could see More ceasefire violations, Cross-border shelling and infiltration attempts. If the mutual commitment to maintain LoC sanctity is abandoned, it could lead to heightened hostilities.
• India’s Response: As of now, India has not issued an official response to Pakistan’s announcement.

Conclusion

The suspension may not have immediate tactical consequences, but it opens the door to greater diplomatic and military brinkmanship. It could undermine regional stability and derail any remaining prospects of dialogue.

DOWNLOAD PDF