Iran is currently experiencing its most severe internal crisis since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, triggered by economic collapse and external pressures.
Background
- Economic Trigger: Protests began on December 28 with a strike by shopkeepers in Tehran’s Grand Bazaar over the collapsing rial and high inflation.
- Compounding Factors: Israeli and US bombings of nuclear sites in June 2025 damaged infrastructure, while the government further angered the public by removing fuel and food subsidies
- Violence and State Crackdown: Protests escalated into violence, prompting a harsh state crackdown; hundreds of civilian deaths were reported, while state media acknowledged casualties among security personnel.
Distinct Nature of the Current Crisis in Iran
- Convergence of Threats: Iran is facing simultaneous domestic unrest and external military threats, unlike earlier crises that were largely isolated.
- U.S. Political Signalling: On January 13, U.S. President Donald Trump urged protesters to “take over” state institutions and said “help is on its way”, escalating external pressure.
Limits of Regime-Change Assumptions
- Not Internally Isolated: Around 30 million people (about 50% of the electorate) voted in the 2024 presidential elections, indicating continued political participation.
- Visible Public Support: On January 12, thousands participated in pro-government rallies.
- Security Apparatus Intact: There are no visible cracks in the loyalty of security forces despite protests and external pressure.
Risks of External Military Intervention
- Regional Destabilisation: A U.S. attack aimed at regime change could further destabilise West Asia.
- Domestic Violence Spiral: Military intervention could push Iran into prolonged cycles of internal violence.
- Historical Evidence: U.S. interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya show that regime-change wars do not resolve internal political crises.
Policy Priorities for Iran’s Stabilisation
- Urgent Domestic Reform: Iran needs swift, credible economic, political, and social reforms to address public grievances.
- Role of Foreign Assistance: Reforms can succeed only with foreign engagement and assistance, not war.
- Preferred International Approach: The global community should engage Iran’s leadership and encourage meaningful reform, rather than pursue military solutions.
Conclusion
Violent external intervention would risk chaos similar to Libya or Iraq, while systematic and incremental domestic reforms offer the only viable path to stability.