//php print_r(get_the_ID()); ?>
In India, the concept of live-in relationships occupies a complex space between legal recognition and societal acceptance. While legal frameworks have evolved to acknowledge and protect live-in relationships, deep-seated societal norms and legal ambiguities continue to challenge these arrangements. The Supreme Court has provided legal protections for individuals in live-in relationships, yet the gap between legal provisions and societal attitudes remains significant.
The Shraddha Walkar Case
The 2022 murder of Shraddha Walkar by her live-in partner brought to light the vulnerabilities associated with live-in relationships. The case highlighted the precarious nature of these relationships, especially when they involve interfaith unions, which remain taboo in many parts of India. The intense media coverage of Walkar’s case included intrusive details about her personal life, shifting focus from the criminal aspects to a critique of her lifestyle choices. This media portrayal reinforced societal norms that view live-in relationships, particularly interfaith ones, as risky and socially unacceptable. Note: Recent surveys indicate that arranged marriages remain the norm in India. Factors like societal pressures, lack of legal protection available to interfaith couples and those in live-in relationships etc. significantly influence individuals’ relationship choices. |
---|
High court judgments frequently reflect a conservative stance, reserving rights primarily for married couples. A 2023 High Court order emphasized that many rights and privileges are reserved for married individuals to preserve and encourage the institution of marriage. This conservative approach highlights the gap between legal recognition and societal acceptance of live-in relationships. While live-in relationships are legally recognized in India, significant gaps remain between legal provisions and societal acceptance. The Supreme Court’s rulings have provided important protections, yet societal prejudices and legal ambiguities continue to challenge individuals in live-in arrangements. Cases like Shraddha Walkar’s and judicial perspectives highlight the need for a more nuanced understanding of live-in relationships and a more adaptable legal framework. Addressing these challenges requires both legal reform and a shift in societal attitudes to ensure that the rights and dignity of individuals in live-in relationships are fully respected and protected.
Mains Practice Question: |
---|
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
How Clean Energy Needs, New Tech Shape Mineral Gov...
Stepping Stone: On Shubhanshu Shukla, NASA-Axiom-I...
How is Global Shipping trying to Decarbonise?
Contesting the Future of Forest Governance
A Tectonic Shift in Thinking to Build Seismic Resi...
Safe Havens No More: On Growing Crime Against Wome...
Monsoon Session of Parliament 2025: 21 Sittings, 8...
Language, Culture, and Identity in India
Indian Army Tests Akash Prime in Ladakh, Boosting ...
Banni Grasslands in Gujarat Ready to Host Cheetahs...
CWC Warns NGT: 34 Glacial Lakes in India Expanding...
Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) Trigger Rare Norther...
<div class="new-fform">
</div>