The Presidents of the United States and China are meeting in Busan, South Korea, to sign a trade deal and announce a Global Peace Plan, signalling deeper strategic cooperation.
Emergence of a New Bipolar World
- Consolidation of G2 Dominance: The USA and China present themselves as the two primary global powers, indicating that the world is shifting toward a new bipolar structure.
- Framework of Shared Responsibility: Both nations propose a framework where they jointly assume responsibility for maintaining global peace and stability.
About the Global Peace Plan
- Elements of the Peace Plan: The Peace Plan includes:
- Exploring limits on nuclear weapons.
- Preventing use of Artificial Intelligence in nuclear command systems.
- Negotiating an Outer Space Treaty to prevent anti-satellite targeting.
- Using combined leverage to pressurise Russia on the Ukraine war (particularly aligned with US objectives).
 
- Motivations of the G2 Leaders:
- US: The US leader seeks to portray himself domestically and globally as a “Peace President” capable of striking historic deals, and endorsement by China boosts his political credibility.
- China: China aims to present itself as co-custodian of global order, positioning China as an equal partner to Washington by projecting leadership through initiatives like the Global Development Initiative and Global Security Initiative.
 
Competitive Coexistence- The Nature of the Current Bipolarity
- Unlike the Cold War: The Cold War was ideological (Communism vs. Capitalism) and involved minimal economic interdependence.
- Today’s bipolarity is characterised by Competitive Coexistence, where both nations compete militarily and technologically but remain deeply connected through trade and supply chains.
 
- Avoiding the Thucydides Trap: The Global Peace Plan is a mechanism to avoid the historical pattern where rising powers and existing powers end up in conflict.
- The Thucydides Trap refers to the risk of conflict when a rising power threatens to displace an established one.
 
Implications for India
- Reduced Strategic Autonomy: A bipolar world pressures middle powers like India, Japan, and Germany to choose sides, narrowing their decision-making independence.
- Shrinking Geopolitical Influence: The dominance of G2 reduces the ability of middle powers to shape global outcomes or negotiate on equal terms.
- Preference for Multipolarity: India’s long-term strategic vision favours a Multipolar World, where power is dispersed across multiple centres rather than concentrated between two superpowers.
Conclusion
The peace initiative may not end US–China rivalry; instead, it marks the beginning of structured management of competition (managed coexistence) — signalling a new bipolar global order based on competitive coexistence.