A recent Delhi High Court ruling set an important example by upholding the conviction of a man who sexually harassed a woman on a public bus in 2015.

Issue of Women’s Safety in Public Spaces

• Rising Incidents of Harassment: Despite stringent laws and policies, women remain vulnerable in public spaces, particularly in public transport.
  • Incidents, such as a 23-year-old woman sustaining severe injuries after jumping off a train to escape an assaulter, and a pregnant woman suffering a miscarriage after being pushed out of a train, reflect the grim reality.
• Regular Ordeal: Harassment remains a regular ordeal for women in unreserved train compartments and on government buses.
• Societal Contradictions: Accountability for this unsafe environment remains a key question in a society that claims to advocate for women’s empowerment.
• Unsafe Public Spaces: In the seminal work, Why Loiter?, Shilpa Phadke, Sameera Khan, and Shilpa Ranade argue that while society says it seeks to protect women, it fails to create safe public spaces.
• Confinement: Instead of improving public safety, society’s actions often confine women to homes, schools, or under the care of others, limiting their freedom and mobility.
• Barriers to Freedom: Women are often forced to constantly consider the time of day they travel, with many being wary of venturing out after dark or before sunrise.

Court Rulings and Legal Precedents

• Delhi High Court view: The court called this harassment in public spaces a “deeply concerning reality” that persists despite decades of independence and stringent laws.
  • Such judgments serve as crucial signals to society that the legal system is committed to protecting women, sending a strong message about the need for change.
• Supreme Court’s Stand : The Supreme Court of India rightly stayed an Allahabad High Court ruling which had outrageously dismissed inappropriate touching of a minor as not amounting to attempted rape. 
  • The Supreme Court’s decision sends a clear and much-needed message: “Totally insensitive and inhuman” interpretations of the law are unacceptable, reinforcing that the law must protect women’s dignity and safety.

Way Forward

• Administrative Responsibility: The responsibility for women’s safety does not lie with the judiciary alone. 
  • Administrative bodies must take proactive steps, including ensuring well-lit streets, trained police officers to handle harassment cases, and promptly filling vacancies in law enforcement.
• Coordinated Approach: Without a coordinated, all-encompassing approach to safety, women will continue to live in fear, and conversations about women’s progress will remain hollow.

Conclusion

The judiciary’s role is vital, but societal and administrative reforms are equally essential to create safe public spaces. Only when safety is guaranteed will the conversation about women’s progress in society truly hold meaning.

DOWNLOAD PDF