The rise of digital platforms has led to surveillance capitalism, where personal data is extracted and monetized.

Surveillance Capitalism

• Focus: Unlike traditional capitalism, which focuses on goods and services, surveillance capitalism extracts human experience as raw material.
• Data Analysis: This data is collected, analysed, and sold to advertisers, political campaigns, and other entities.
  • Tech giants like Google, Meta, and Amazon have turned the internet into a massive surveillance system, tracking every click, search, and purchase—even offline movements in some cases.

Working of Surveillance Capitalism

• Instrumentarian Power: Instrumentarian power is a type of power that uses technology to control people’s behavior and monetize it
• Origins: Surveillance Capitalism was coined by Shoshana Zuboff, this refers to subtle control over behaviour without direct coercion. 
  • It is achieved through predictive analytics, recommendation algorithms, and targeted advertising.
• Social Physics: Introduced by Alex Pentland, this concept shows how large datasets of human interactions reveal patterns. This allows corporations and policymakers to predict and influence collective behaviour.
• Differences: Industrial Capitalism Relies on labour and material production and focuses on efficiency, productivity, and labour control in manufacturing. 
  • Whereas surveillance Capitalism relies on profits from behavioural data extraction instead of tangible goods. 
    • Users are both consumers and raw material for data-driven predictions in surveillance capitalism.
    •  It prioritizes data collection over autonomy, monetising every interaction.

Impact on Society

• Manipulation of Choices: Algorithms nudge users towards actions that benefit corporations, reducing autonomy.
• Erosion of Privacy: Everyday interactions, even private conversations, can fuel targeted advertising.
• Commercial and Political Influence: Data is used not only for ads but also to shape public opinion and social trends.
• Exploitation: Zuboff compares surveillance capitalism to colonialism and industrial capitalism, as it exploits human experience for profit. 
  • It prioritises corporate gain over individual autonomy, reshaping digital interactions and economic structures.

Challenges associated with Surveillance Capitalism

• Controlling Behaviour: Algorithms keep users engaged and guide choices that benefit tech companies. Digital platforms use predictive analytics to nudge users toward desired actions, such as purchases, content engagement, or political views.
• State Surveillance: Tech companies and governments increasingly collaborate in intelligence gathering and policing. State surveillance now relies on privately collected data instead of independent infrastructure. Governments access this data through:
  • Legal means (data-sharing agreements, regulations).
  • Extra-legal methods (backdoor access, informal cooperation).
• Lack of accountability: Much of this surveillance occurs within private corporations, beyond public scrutiny.
• Mass surveillance: Deregulation allows unchecked data collection, reinforcing mass surveillance.
• Loss of Autonomy: Individuals face growing risks of data exploitation and loss of autonomy, as both corporations and states benefit from widespread surveillance.
• Systemic Fragility: Highly interconnected digital networks create systemic fragility. Data disruptions in one area can cause cascading failures across multiple sectors. Major threats include data breaches, algorithmic failures, and misinformation crises.
  • For ex: Cambridge Analytica Scandal (2014) where  facebook user data was harvested without consent. 
    • It used to create targeted political advertisements in the U.S. elections.
    • It exposed how personal data can be weaponised to influence democratic processes.
• Erosion of Autonomy: Continuous data monitoring refines behavioural predictions. Algorithmic content subtly conditions user preferences and decisions. This reinforces corporate and advertiser interests, diminishing individual free will.
• Long-term Consequences: Individuals gradually lose decision-making autonomy. Tech corporations gain disproportionate power to shape opinions and consumer behaviour. 
  • Democratic integrity is threatened, as digital platforms can manipulate political and social discourse.
• Inadequate Regulations: Laws like GDPR (EU) and DPDPA (India) aim to enhance user control over personal data. However, these fail to tackle the root issue—the commodification of personal information.
  •  Regulations are built for traditional capitalism, not the structural impact of surveillance capitalism.
• Political Interests: Tech corporations lobby against stringent regulations to protect their business models. Tech leaders entering politics blur the lines between corporate and state power. 
  • Favourable policies ensure continued data exploitation while limiting individual control.
• Lack of Autonomy: Weak enforcement of data protection laws allows unchecked surveillance. Surveillance capitalism benefits both corporations and governments, reducing oversight. Individuals remain vulnerable to data exploitation, with minimal legal recourse.

Conclusion

Surveillance capitalism must be critically discussed to push for stronger policies. Public awareness is crucial for demanding stricter data privacy protections. Governments must adopt comprehensive regulations to prevent unchecked corporate control over personal data.

DOWNLOAD PDF