Core Demand of the Question
- Discuss the reasons Behind Under-Representation of Women in Judiciary.
- What is the impact of Underrepresentation of women in judiciary.
- Provide a Way Forward.
|
Answer
The under-representation of women in India’s judiciary undermines gender equity and limits diverse perspectives in decision-making. Despite their pivotal role in justice, women occupy a small fraction of judicial positions. Empowering women through law demands addressing this systemic imbalance.
Reasons Behind Under-Representation of Women in Judiciary (with Data & Examples)
- Structural Entry Barriers: Women often face interrupted legal careers due to caregiving roles, impacting their eligibility for higher judiciary, which mandates consistent 7 years of practice.
Example: The 2021 Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy report shows women constitute around 15% of practising advocates in India.
- Opaque Collegium System: The appointment process lacks transparency and gender balance.
Example: Since its establishment in 1950, the Supreme Court has had only 11 women judges.
- Inadequate Infrastructure: Many lower courts lack basic facilities like functional toilets and security, discouraging women from joining or staying in judicial roles.
Example: Nearly 20% of district court complexes lack separate toilets for women, with inadequate facilities & no gender-inclusive toilets
- Gender Bias and Stereotypes: Women are often overlooked for complex or criminal cases and are disproportionately assigned to “women-related” issues like family law.
- Lack of Role Models and Mentorship: With very few women reaching the top positions, young women in law lack visible career paths or mentors to guide them.
Impact of Under-Representation
- Judicial Insensitivity in Gender Cases: Under-representation often results in judgments that lack empathy or understanding of gender dynamics, reinforcing patriarchal attitudes.
- Erosion of Public Trust: Lack of diversity reduces the judiciary’s credibility in the eyes of marginalized groups, especially women and minorities.
Example: Women made up just 13.4% of judges in the High Courts and only 9.3% in the Supreme Court of India.
- Lack of Diversity in Judicial Reasoning: A bench lacking gender diversity may offer limited legal interpretations on issues like sexual harassment, domestic violence, and reproductive rights.
- Delayed Gender Justice Reforms: Without women’s perspectives, legal reforms on issues like marital rape, workplace harassment, or child custody can be stalled or lack nuance.
Example: The criminalization of marital rape remains stalled, likely due to insufficient diverse perspectives on the bench.
- Missed Leadership in Policy and Administration: Women judges are underrepresented in court administration, law commissions, and the collegium, affecting gender-sensitive decision-making.
Way Forward
- Institutional Reforms AIJS Implementation: The All India Judicial Service (AIJS), once implemented, could ensure merit-based, gender-neutral recruitment across lower judiciary.
Example: The 116th Law Commission recommended AIJS to streamline recruitment and enhance diversity in judicial appointments.
- Gender-Sensitive Infrastructure: Ensuring safe transport, functional washrooms, and creches can help retain women judges, especially at lower levels.
Example: In 2022, the Rajasthan High Court mandated all subordinate courts to have separate women’s restrooms and nursing rooms.
- Reservation/Quotas in Lower Judiciary: Some states have taken the lead in reserving seats for women in judicial exams.
- Mentorship and Leadership Development: Training programs and mentoring networks can support women in law to rise through the ranks.
Example: The Women in Law & Litigation (WILL) Forum provides mentorship to young female lawyers and promotes judicial inclusion.
- Regular Representation Audits: Periodic release of gender-disaggregated data can help track progress and identify bottlenecks.
Under-representation of women in India’s judiciary undermines the principles of justice, inclusivity, and equality. As Justice Bela Trivedi aptly noted, “we should empower women through law, not sympathy.” A multidimensional strategy spanning structural reforms, institutional transparency, and societal mindset change is vital to make the judiciary reflective of the society it serves.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
Latest Comments