Core Demand of the Question
- Paradigm Shift (SHANTI Act)
- Challenges in achieving 100 GW Target
- Way Forward
|
Answer
Introduction
India’s nuclear power contributes ~3% of electricity with just 1.8% capacity (~8.8 GW), far below requirements. Achieving Viksit Bharat and net-zero demands rapid expansion to 100 GW by 2047, making reforms like SHANTI Act critical.
Body
Paradigm Shift (SHANTI Act)
- Private Entry: Allows private firms to build, own, operate plants ending Department of Atomic Energy monopoly.
Eg: Needed to mobilize ~$200 billion investment for 90 GW addition.
- Market Model: Shifts from state-led to competitive nuclear ecosystem.
Eg: Enables industries (steel, data centres) to adopt captive nuclear power.
- Regulatory Status: Grants statutory autonomy to AERB for credible oversight aligning with global norms.
- Liability Reform: Revises CLNDA to reduce investor risk and attract foreign players.
Eg: Addresses long-standing concerns of suppliers like Westinghouse, EDF.
- Legal Overhaul: Replaces Atomic Energy Act 1962 & CLNDA 2010 with unified framework.
Challenges in achieving 100 GW Target
- High Cost: Nuclear power expansion requires massive capital investment (≈ ₹18 lakh crore).
Eg: Imported reactor designs cost over $5 million/MW, compared to about $2 million/MW for PHWRs.
- Technological Dependence: India remains reliant on foreign reactor designs and technology, limiting self-sufficiency.
Eg: Projects like Jaitapur and Kovvada have been delayed for over a decade.
- Waste Management Issues: There is lack of clarity on long-term disposal and management of nuclear waste.
- Public Fear & Resistance: Safety concerns and land acquisition issues persist, influenced by past global nuclear accidents, shaping negative public perception.
- Skill Gaps: There is a shortage of skilled manpower and a weak domestic supply chain.
Eg: India needs a comprehensive ecosystem similar to China’s rapid reactor expansion model.
Way Forward
- Indigenous Focus: India should scale up PHWRs (220/700 MW) and develop Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) to enhance self-reliance.
Eg: Government has allocated about ₹20,000 crore for SMR R&D.
- Cost Reduction: Adopting fleet mode construction and modular techniques can significantly reduce costs and delays.
Eg: PHWRs can be completed in around 40 months under standardised construction.
- Financing Models: There is a need to develop PPP models and long-term tariff frameworks to attract investment.
Eg: Nuclear power becomes viable due to its 60-year lifecycle and low operating costs.
- Regulatory Clarity: Clear and transparent policies on tariffs, liability, and fuel supply are essential.
- Public Trust: Building public confidence requires strong safety standards and greater awareness.
Eg: Strengthening institutions like the AERB and ensuring transparent waste management can help.
Conclusion
Nuclear energy is central to achieving Viksit Bharat and net-zero by 2070, offering reliable baseload power. Effective SHANTI Act implementation, with transparency and indigenous capacity, can transform India into a competitive, low-carbon nuclear powerhouse.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
Latest Comments