Answer:

Simultaneous elections in India, also referred to as “One Nation, One Election,” propose conducting Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections together. Advocates believe this will reduce electoral costs, streamline governance, and minimise disruption caused by the frequent imposition of the Model Code of Conduct. However, challenges remain, particularly in balancing federalism and addressing logistical concerns. 

Potential Impacts of Simultaneous Elections:

• Cost Reduction: Simultaneous elections can lower the significant costs of separate elections, particularly related to logistics, security, and administrative expenses.
  For example: The Election Commission estimates that holding general and state elections together could save billions in operational costs, freeing resources for development.
• Reduction in Disruption to Governance: Frequent elections disrupt governance due to the Model Code of Conduct, which restricts government decision-making during election periods.
  For example: In 2019, government projects were delayed due to state assembly elections clashing with national elections, highlighting governance inefficiencies.
• Increased Legislative Productivity: With fewer election cycles, legislators can focus on governance and policy-making rather than campaigning, leading to better legislative output and long-term policy planning.
  For example: The Parliamentary Standing Committees often face interruptions during elections, delaying legislative scrutiny and decision-making.
• Improved Voter Turnout: Combining elections may increase voter participation by simplifying the process and making it more convenient for citizens to vote in both state and national elections.
  For example: Data from Odisha’s 2019 elections shows higher turnout when simultaneous state and national elections were held.
• Harmonisation of Policies Across States and Centre: Simultaneous elections could lead to better coordination of policies between states and the central government, ensuring consistency in governance and implementation.
  For example: NITI Aayog suggested that synchronised governance could improve the delivery of central schemes like PM Kisan and Ayushman Bharat.

Challenges of Simultaneous Elections:

• Erosion of Federalism: Holding simultaneous elections may undermine the importance of state-level issues, with national issues overshadowing local concerns, affecting the balance of federalism.
  For example: In federal structures like Germany, staggered elections ensure that local and national issues are addressed separately to maintain regional autonomy.
• Logistical and Security Challenges: Conducting simultaneous elections across a diverse and populous country like India presents immense logistical challenges in terms of security forces, voting machines, and personnel deployment.
  For example: The Election Commission of India noted logistical hurdles during the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, with over a million polling stations set up.
• Complications with Mid-term Dissolution: If a state assembly dissolves mid-term, holding elections for only the remaining tenure complicates synchronisation, reducing the efficiency of simultaneous elections.
  For example: In 2019, Maharashtra Assembly was dissolved prematurely, requiring out-of-sync elections under the proposed system.
• Voter Confusion: Bundling national and state elections may confuse voters, leading them to prioritise national issues over state-specific concerns, weakening the state democratic process.
  For example: In Odisha’s 2019 elections, despite distinct preferences for state and national leadership, voters faced challenges differentiating between issues.
• Constitutional Amendments: Simultaneous elections require significant constitutional amendments, including changes in terms for state and central legislatures, which may face opposition and need extensive consensus-building.
  For example: The Ram Nath Kovind Committee suggested 15 constitutional amendments, requiring the consent of more than half of India’s states.

Way Forward:

• Phased Implementation: A phased approach starting with Lok Sabha and select state assemblies can help test the feasibility of simultaneous elections without overwhelming the electoral system.
  For instance: The Law Commission of India suggested implementing the proposal in stages to ensure smooth transitions and address challenges incrementally.
• Strengthening Digital Infrastructure: Upgrading digital infrastructure like Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs)and Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs) can enhance efficiency and reduce logistical hurdles in simultaneous elections.
  For example: The Election Commission is testing blockchain-based voting systems to ensure security and transparency in elections.
• Public Awareness Campaigns: Raising voter awareness through digital literacy campaigns can reduce confusion and help voters differentiate between state and national issues during simultaneous elections.
  For example: Initiatives like Digital India and e-Election awareness programs can educate citizens on the new system.
• Legal Reforms: Comprehensive legal reforms addressing ambiguities around mid-term dissolutions are necessary to ensure that the electoral system remains robust and flexible.
  For example: The Law Commission recommended amendments to the Representation of People Act, 1951, to provide clarity on election schedules.
• Stakeholder Consensus: Achieving consensus with political parties, civil society, and state governments is crucial for the successful implementation of simultaneous elections, ensuring that federal principles are preserved.
  For instance: The Union Cabinet emphasised stakeholder engagement in the 2023 discussions to ensure widespread support for the proposal.

The simultaneous election system holds potential for streamlining governance and reducing costs, but its success hinges on overcoming significant constitutional, logistical, and federal challenges. A phased approach, coupled with strong institutional reforms and public awareness, can help ensure that simultaneous elections foster democratic principles while addressing India’s unique socio-political complexities.

DOWNLOAD PDF