Core Demand of the Question
- Implications of continued reliance on GST compensation cess beyond its original purpose.
- Arguments against phasing out the GST compensation cess.
- Arguments in favour of phasing out the GST compensation cess.
|
Answer
The GST Compensation Cess, introduced in 2017, was designed to compensate states for revenue losses following GST implementation, based on an expected 14% annual growth from 2015–16. Originally planned for five years, its term has been extended to March 2026, raising questions about fiscal prudence and the dynamics of Centre-State financial relations. This extension has sparked renewed discussions on whether to phase out or repurpose the cess.
Implications of Continued Reliance on GST Compensation Cess
- Undermines GST Uniformity: The ongoing cess distorts the ‘one nation, one tax’ principle by creating non-uniform tax rates across States.
Eg: Luxury items like cars and tobacco attract both GST and cess, complicating the tax structure.
- Increases Consumer Prices: The cess adds to the cost of goods such as tobacco and luxury items, fueling inflation.
Eg: The automotive sector faces increased prices due to the combined GST and cess burden..
- Centre’s Fiscal Overdependence: Continued reliance reflects the Centre’s burden to manage historic compensation liabilities.
Eg: The Centre is set to repay ₹2.69 lakh crore GST compensation loans from FY21 and FY22 by November 2025, using cess collections.
- Delays in State Reforms: Dependence on compensation delays States from broadening their tax bases and improving their own revenue.
Eg: Some States hesitated to expand GST coverage due to guaranteed cess compensation.
- Distorts Consumption Behaviour: A Higher cess on specific goods affects consumer demand patterns.
Eg: Tobacco, colas, and luxury goods remain costly, impacting small sellers and middle-income consumers.
Arguments Against Phasing Out the GST Compensation Cess
- States Still Need Support: Several States continue to face revenue shortfalls and depend on compensation.
Eg: States such as Punjab rely substantially on this compensation, making it a crucial component of their overall revenue.
- COVID-19 Impact Not Fully Over: The cess extension was crucial for compensating for pandemic-related fiscal shocks.
- Risk of Fiscal Gap: Abrupt cess removal might create budget deficits for States reliant on the compensation.
Eg: In 2023–24, Karnataka estimated a ₹26,954 crore shortfall in GST collections due to the cessation of the compensation scheme, highlighting the state’s ongoing fiscal challenges.
- Political Opposition: States fearing revenue loss may resist GST reforms if the cess is removed prematurely.
Eg: States like West Bengal and Kerala have opposed the cess phase-out, citing financial risks.
- Incomplete Compensation Mechanism: A permanent revenue-sharing framework post-cess is still under development.
Eg: The GST Council is yet to finalize a formula replacing cess-based compensation after 2026.
Arguments in Favour of Phasing Out the GST Compensation Cess
- Purpose Achieved: The GST system has matured, and States’ revenues have stabilized, making the cess phase-out timely.
Eg: GST collections hit ₹1.85 lakh crore in June 2025, reflecting economic recovery.
- Stimulates Demand: Removing cess lowers prices, encouraging consumer spending and economic revival.
- Simplifies Taxation: Aligns with GST Council’s plan to reduce multiple tax slabs and simplify the structure.
Eg: Fitment committee recommendations advocate cess elimination to streamline tax rates.
- Promotes State Accountability: Encourages States to enhance their own revenue sources and reduce reliance on compensation.
Eg: States like Gujarat and Karnataka successfully diversified revenues post-cess reduction.
India must rethink the GST compensation cess post-2026, possibly transforming it into a green cess to support environmental goals. Strengthening state revenues, reducing dependence on cesses, and implementing GST reforms will ensure fiscal sustainability, balanced Centre-State relations, and inclusive growth aligned with India’s economic and climate priorities.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
Latest Comments