Q. Persistent disruptions in Parliament have weakened its role as a forum for debate, accountability, and representation. In this context, examine how institutional reforms can strengthen parliamentary democracy in India. (10 Marks, 150 Words)

Core Demand of the Question

  • Institutional Reforms to Strengthen Parliamentary Democracy
  • Associated Concerns with These Reforms

Answer

Introduction

Persistent disruptions in Parliament have eroded its deliberative character, weakened executive accountability, and diluted representative law-making. Frequent adjournments, declining debate time, and confrontational politics have raised concerns about democratic backsliding, making institutional reforms essential to restore parliamentary effectiveness and credibility.

Body

Institutional Reforms to Strengthen Parliamentary Democracy

  • Stronger Committee System: Referring Bills to parliamentary committees ensures detailed scrutiny, bipartisan inputs, and evidence-based law-making beyond floor disruptions.
  • Reformed Question Hour: Protecting Question Hour enhances executive accountability by enabling legislators to question ministries regularly and transparently.
  • Code of Conduct: A stricter disciplinary framework can deter disorderly conduct and enforce legislative decorum across party lines. The need for enforceable conduct rules for MPs.
  • Predictable Sitting Calendar: Fixing minimum sitting days ensures adequate legislative discussion and reduces rushed law-making.
    Eg: India’s Parliament sitting fewer days than comparable democracies.

Associated Concerns with These Reforms

  • Political Resistance: Parties may resist reforms that restrict protest tools, viewing disruptions as legitimate opposition strategy.
    Eg: Frequent standoffs over opposition protest rights.
  • Executive Dominance: Stronger executive control can undermine parliamentary scrutiny despite institutional mechanisms.
    Eg: Growing use of ordinances and guillotine motions.
  • Speaker Neutrality: Perceived partisan role of the Speaker may weaken fair enforcement of disciplinary reforms.
  • Limited Enforcement: Rules without political consensus risk remaining symbolic rather than transformative.

Conclusion

Institutional reforms can revive Parliament only when complemented by political will, ethical leadership, and respect for democratic norms. Strengthening committees, accountability tools, and decorum must go hand-in-hand with consensus-building to ensure Parliament functions as a deliberative, representative, and accountable democratic institution.

To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">







    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.