Private Member’s Bill on Permanent State Reorganisation Framework

A private member’s bill was introduced in Parliament to establish a permanent framework for the reorganisation of states.

About Private Member’s Bill

• Definition: A Private Member’s Bill is a legislative proposal introduced by a Member of Parliament who is not a minister.
  • It allows non-minister MPs to propose laws and raise important public issues, even though such bills rarely get passed.

Reasons for the Need of a Permanent Framework for States’ Reorganisation

• From Political Compulsion to Scientific Basis: Decisions to create or divide states should be based on scientific and permanent criteria rather than political compulsion or crisis-driven responses.
• The creation of Telangana illustrates how prolonged protests often precede state formation, highlighting the need for a systematic process.

Shift in Rationale for New States

• Linguistic Identity (1953): Following the death of Potti Sreeramulu, the Government of India established the State Reorganisation Commission (SRC) to examine the reorganisation of states.
  • The Commission recommended linguistic reorganisation of states to facilitate administrative convenience, enhance access to education, and preserve cultural and linguistic identity.
• Development and Efficiency (2000s): States such as Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, and Chhattisgarh were created to address regional neglect and improve administrative efficiency, as governance was perceived to be distant and unresponsive.

Problem of Administrative Distance

• Administrative Challenges of Large States: States such as Uttar Pradesh (over 240 million people) and Maharashtra and Bihar (around 125–130 million each) are larger than many European countries in terms of administrative area, posing size-related governance challenges.
• Bureaucratic Layers: Multiple administrative tiers weaken the transmission of citizens’ concerns to the state capital.
• Governance Deficit: Policies framed at higher levels often face implementation gaps in remote areas, creating a mismatch between allocations and outcomes.
• Administrative efficiency: Smaller states, such as Kerala or Himachal Pradesh, often demonstrate relatively greater administrative responsiveness and communicate more quickly, because of their manageable size.

Proposed Criteria for Reorganisation in the Bill

• Shift from Reactive Populism: Rather than endorsing specific regional demands, the proposal seeks to institutionalise a structured and objective process for state reorganisation, moving away from reactive populism driven by protests or agitation.
• Economic Viability: The proposed state must be fiscally sustainable and not excessively dependent on central grants.
• Administrative Efficiency: Reorganisation should lead to improved governance, faster service delivery, and effective justice administration.
• National Unity: The federal fabric must remain intact, and state reorganisation should strengthen, not weaken, national goals.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store

Conclusion

State reorganisation is not merely a territorial exercise but a structural reform aimed at enhancing governance, fiscal strength, and long-term development within the federal framework.