Answer:

India’s justice delivery system is grappling with a severe backlog, reflecting deep-rooted challenges in ensuring timely judicial outcomes. Over 50 million cases are currently pending in various courts, with a staggering 90% of these in district and subordinate courts. This bottleneck not only strains the legal system but also undermines the overall socio-economic development of the country.

Issues plaguing India’s justice delivery system:

• High Pendency of Cases: The extensive backlog in district and subordinate courts signifies a deep-rooted issue of delayed justice.
  For instance: During Covid-19 the number of pending cases in the Allahabad High Court, one of the largest in India, had reached over 1 million pending cases.
• Inefficient Judicial Appointments: The collegium system currently used for appointing judges has been criticized for its lack of transparency and inclusiveness, often perceived as favoring certain “judicial families.”
  For instance: Critics argue that the system limits judicial diversity, as seen in repeated appointments from the same backgrounds.
• Government as a Major Litigant: Governments, both central and state, are frequently involved in litigation, significantly contributing to the clogged judicial machinery.
• Inadequate Infrastructure: Many courts suffer from inadequate infrastructure and staffing, which hampers their operational efficiency and ability to handle large case volumes.
  For instance: Rural courts in India often lack even basic digital resources and adequate staffing.
• Outdated Practices: The continuation of colonial-era practices, such as long court vacations, adds to delays and reduces the working days available for case hearings. For instance: Indian courts still observe a long summer break, which contributes to delay of proceedings by several weeks.
• Lack of Technological Integration: Despite some advancements during the COVID-19 pandemic, the full potential of technology in streamlining case management and hearings remains largely untapped.
  For instance: Only a fraction of Indian courts have fully functional digital filing systems.

Reforms to address the problem of judicial delays:

• Revamping Judicial Appointments: Reintroduction of a reformed NJAC with adequate safeguards could ensure more transparent and broad-based judicial appointments.
  For instance: The new system could include more diverse stakeholders in the selection process, enhancing legitimacy and diversity.
• National Litigation Policy: Implementation of a robust policy to minimize frivolous litigation reducing  unnecessary backlog.
  For example: UK’s ‘Litigation Gateway’, screens out meritless claims filed by government departments.
• Enhanced Infrastructure: Investment in modernizing court infrastructure and increasing the workforce, including the introduction of shift systems in courts, could expedite case processing.
  For example: Japan utilizes night court sessions for minor cases, significantly reducing daytime caseloads.
• Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): Promoting mechanisms like mediation, arbitration, and lok adalats to settle disputes outside the court system can decrease the load on formal courts.
  For example: The mandatory mediation step in Italy for most civil cases has reduced court caseloads.
• Technological Adoption: Expanding the use of virtual hearings and digital case management systems can make the justice delivery system more efficient.
  For example: Brazil’s virtual court systems allow for remote processing and resolution of cases, increasing efficiency.
• Judicial Time Management: Reducing vacation periods and implementing strict guidelines for adjournments and case timelines can significantly decrease delays.
  For example: Singapore’s strict court management practices have nearly eliminated unnecessary adjournments, leading to one of the fastest trial times in the world.

Contribution of these reforms in  improving the ease of doing business and ease of living in India:

• Faster Resolution of Commercial Disputes: By reducing the time and cost associated a more predictable and efficient legal environment is created. This encourages investment and entrepreneurial activity, as businesses can operate with greater confidence in the legal system. 
  For instance: Faster dispute resolutions in Singapore have attracted international businesses seeking reliable legal environments.
• Increased Public Trust: Timely justice increases public trust in the legal system, essential for maintaining social order and democratic governance.
  For instance: In Denmark, high trust in an efficient judiciary correlates with low corruption levels and high civic participation.
• Economic Growth: Reducing judicial delays can lead to faster dispute resolution, beneficial for the economy as it decreases the cost of legal uncertainties.
  For instance: Quick legal resolutions in the USA have been shown to reduce the economic burden of long-standing disputes.
• Enhanced Quality of Life: Quicker legal resolutions mean less time and resources spent by individuals in legal battles, directly enhancing the ease of living.
  For example: In Germany, expedited processes in family courts have minimized the emotional and financial strain on families.
• Promotion of Fair Practices: Improved judicial processes can deter corrupt practices and promote fair business and governance practices.
  For example: By ensuring that judicial processes are open and accessible, Finland has built a system where accountability is paramount. As a result, public trust in the legal system and government institutions is strengthened,
• Global Competitiveness: An efficient judiciary is a hallmark of a mature, functional democracy, enhancing India’s image on the global stage.
  For instance: New Zealand’s efficient legal system boosts its international standing as a stable and attractive country for investment.

Reforming the justice delivery system in India is not just a legal necessity but a socio-economic imperative. The proposed reforms, if implemented effectively, have the potential to transform the landscape of Indian judiciary, making justice accessible and timely. This transformation will not only improve India’s global business image but also enhance the overall quality of life, propelling the nation towards a more just and equitable society.

DOWNLOAD PDF