//php print_r(get_the_ID()); ?>
Core Demand of the Question
|
Nepotism, favouring relatives or close associates, often undermines merit and fairness across politics, business, and entertainment. Recent Gen Z protests in Nepal demanding transparency highlight rising discontent against such practices and the push for accountability.
Parameter | Nepotism | Merit-Based System |
Basis of Opportunity | Opportunities are given based on family, kinship, or personal connections. | Opportunities are awarded based on skills, performance, and qualifications. |
Fairness | Often unfair and biased, favoring a few privileged individuals. | Transparent and equitable, rewarding competence and talent. |
Social Mobility | Limits upward mobility for capable individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds. | Promotes social mobility and equality by rewarding talent. |
Performance Outcomes | May lead to underperformance as positions are not earned based on ability. | Encourages high performance and productivity as positions are earned on merit. |
Perception in Society | Seen as unethical and eroding trust in institutions. | Strengthens trust in institutions and fosters a culture of accountability. |
Nepotism fosters trust, loyalty, and smooth coordination, ensures quick decision-making, continuity, and preserves organizational values. However, it also has negative implications.
While nepotism can foster trust and continuity, it broadly erodes meritocracy, deepens inequality, and weakens institutions. Combating it requires transparent recruitment, equal opportunity policies, and a culture valuing talent over connections.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
<div class="new-fform">
</div>
Latest Comments