Q. The global order is moving from U.S.-led unipolarity to a fluid multipolar system. Discuss how the U.S. shift towards the Western Hemisphere and its reduced focus on Europe reflect this transition, and analyse the implications for middle powers such as India. (15 Marks, 250 Words)

Core Demand of the Question

  • U.S. Shift Toward Western Hemisphere and Reduced Europe Focus.
  • Opportunities for Indian Diplomacy in 2026.
  • Positive Implications for Middle Powers.
  • Negative Implications for Middle Powers.

Answer

Introduction

The post-Cold War “unipolar moment” is yielding to a fluid multipolarity. As the U.S. recalibrates its global commitments to prioritize domestic resilience and strategic competition in its immediate neighborhood, the absence of a single hegemon allows regional powers to assert greater influence in a fragmented geopolitical landscape.

Body

U.S. Shift Toward Western Hemisphere and Reduced Europe Focus

  • Strategic Retrenchment: The U.S. is prioritizing “near-shoring” and regional stability over expansive European security guarantees to counter Chinese influence in the Americas.
    Eg: The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity (APEP) highlight this shift.
  • Burden Sharing: Washington increasingly demands that European allies lead their own security architecture, reducing the U.S. “security umbrella” footprint.
    Eg: Frequent U.S. calls for NATO members to meet the 2% GDP defense spending target reflect this pivot.
  • Indo-Pacific Priority: Resources previously allocated to the Atlantic are being diverted to the Indo-Pacific to contain peer competitors.
    Eg: The AUKUS alliance and the Quad signify a departure from Euro-centric traditionalism.
  • Economic Protectionism: The shift toward the “Inflation Reduction Act” signifies a “Fortress America” approach, prioritizing domestic industry over global trade policing.
    Eg: Subsidies under the CHIPS Act have caused friction with European tech giants.

Opportunities for Indian Diplomacy in 2026

  • Strategic Autonomy: A fluid order allows India to maintain “multi-alignment,” engaging with rival blocs based on national interest.
    Eg: India’s continued purchase of Russian S-400 systems while deepening U.S. defense ties.
  • Global South Leadership: As the U.S. focuses inward, India can champion the concerns of developing nations in forums like the G20.
    Eg: The inclusion of the African Union in G20 under India’s presidency.
  • Technological Sovereignty: India can leverage the “China Plus One” strategy to become a global semiconductor and green energy hub.
    Eg: The India-U.S. iCET (Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology).
  • Maritime Security: India can fill the security vacuum in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) as a “Net Security Provider.”
    Eg: Mission Sagar and anti-piracy operations in the Arabian Sea.

Positive Implications for Middle Powers 

  • Enhanced Bargaining Power: Multipolarity prevents “bloc-blackmailing,” giving India leverage to negotiate better trade and tech deals.
    Eg: India’s Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) with EFTA nations.
  • Institutional Reform: The decline of unipolarity accelerates the demand for “reformed multilateralism” in the UNSC and IMF.
    Eg: Expanding the BRICS to include six new members to challenge Western financial hegemony.
  • Regional Hegemony: India can consolidate its influence in South Asia and the IOR without excessive superpower interference.
    Eg: The BIMSTEC Master Plan for Transport Connectivity.
  • Defense Indigenization: Reduced reliance on a single hegemon spurs domestic military-industrial growth through co-development.
    Eg: The GE-F414 jet engine co-production deal between India and the U.S..

Negative Implications for Middle Powers 

  • Security Volatility: The absence of a global policeman increases regional conflicts and disrupts vital global supply chains.
    Eg: Red Sea disruptions by Houthi rebels impacting Indian trade volumes.
  • Economic Fragmentation: Rising protectionism and “friend-shoring” lead to trade wars that hurt export-oriented emerging economies.
    Eg: U.S. and EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM) impacting Indian steel exports.
  • Aggressive Neighbors: A perceived U.S. retreat may embolden revisionist powers like China to alter status quo borders.
    Eg: Continued Line of Actual Control (LAC) tensions in Eastern Ladakh.
  • Resource Competition: Multipolarity triggers a scramble for critical minerals, potentially pricing out middle powers from high-tech supply chains.
    Eg: China’s export curbs on Gallium and Germanium, vital for India’s electronics industry.

Conclusion

India must navigate this “multipolar world with bipolar characteristics” by strengthening domestic capabilities while building issue-based coalitions. By balancing ties between the “Global West” and “Global South,” India can transform from a “balancing power” to a “leading power,” ensuring a stable, rules-based democratic order.

To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">







    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.