Answer

The Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act (PECA) 2019 was enacted in India to ban the production, sale, and distribution of electronic cigarettes, addressing health risks associated with e-cigarette usage. With e-cigarettes emerging as a potential gateway to nicotine addiction, PECA aimed to curb youth access to these products. According to the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) 2019, 28.6% of adults in India use some form of tobacco, underscoring the need for effective measures to prevent new forms of addiction.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Effectiveness of the Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act (PECA) 2019 

• Increased Enforcement of E-Cigarette Ban: PECA has led to increased enforcement actions against illegal e-cigarette sales, curtailing their availability, especially in urban areas.
  For example: 
• Reduction in Youth Access to E-Cigarettes: By banning the sale of e-cigarettes, PECA has restricted youth access to these products, helping prevent potential nicotine addiction among younger populations.
  For instance: Schools and colleges in several states have reported decreased student possession of e-cigarettes due to strict enforcement of the ban.
• Increased Awareness on E-Cigarette Hazards: PECA has raised awareness about the health risks associated with e-cigarettes, aiding in public education efforts to discourage nicotine use.
  For example: Awareness campaigns led by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) have informed citizens about the dangers of vaping, influencing public opinion against e-cigarette use.
• Deterrence Against E-Cigarette Marketing and Advertising: PECA restricts the advertising of e-cigarettes, cutting off promotional channels that previously targeted youth and first-time users, thereby reducing market expansion.
  For instance: The ban on advertising in digital media has decreased the visibility of e-cigarettes, with fewer advertisements seen on platforms popular among young users.
• Alignment with Global Tobacco Control Standards: PECA aligns India’s policies with global public health standards, emphasising the country’s commitment to reduce tobacco dependence in all forms.
  For instance: As a signatory to the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), India’s ban on e-cigarettes supports broader international goals to reduce nicotine addiction

Limitations of the Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act (PECA) 2019 in Combating the Illegal Tobacco Market in India

• Inadequate Monitoring and Enforcement Capabilities: PECA lacks sufficient monitoring mechanisms, making it challenging to track illegal e-cigarette sales, especially in online and underground markets where transactions are harder to control.
  For instance: Reports from the Ministry of Health highlight that online sales of e-cigarettes continue to bypass regulatory controls, reaching youth through social media.
• Increase in Smuggling and Black Market Sales: The ban has fueled a black market, as demand for e-cigarettes persists, leading to smuggling and unregulated sales that evade health and safety checks.
  For example: Thailand had imposed stringent bans a decade ago, and is now grappling with a thriving black market for e-cigarettes.
• Lack of Consumer Awareness on Legal Risks: Many users are unaware of the legal risks associated with e-cigarette possession post-ban, which limits compliance and continues to fuel demand.
  For instance: Surveys reveal that a significant portion of young users are unaware of PECA’s penalties, contributing to casual possession and use of illegal e-cigarettes.
• Limited Impact on Traditional Tobacco Alternatives: PECA does not address traditional tobacco products like cigarettes and bidis, which continue to be affordable and accessible, diverting users from e-cigarettes back to conventional forms.
  For instance: Bidi and cigarette consumption in India remains high, unaffected by the e-cigarette ban, especially in rural regions where traditional tobacco is cheaper.
• Insufficient Provisions for Rehabilitation and Cessation Support: While PECA prohibits e-cigarette use, it lacks provisions to support users in overcoming addiction, reducing the ban’s effectiveness in long-term public health improvement.

Lessons from Global Best Practices to Tackle Tobacco Addiction and Reduce Smoking Rates in India

Tackling Tobacco Addiction

• Implementation of High Tobacco Taxes: Imposition of high taxes makes tobacco products less affordable and accessible.
  For example: Australia’s high excise tax on cigarettes has been linked to a steady decline in smoking rates since the tax’s implementation.
• Behavioral Counseling and Support Programs: Several nations provide free behavioural counselling for tobacco users, which has proven effective in aiding individuals to quit.
  For example: The UK’s National Health Service (NHS) offers free smoking cessation counselling, which has significantly reduced smoking rates among users.
• Subsidised Nicotine Replacement Therapies (NRTs): Providing subsidies or free NRT products like patches and gum can encourage users to quit traditional tobacco.
  For example: Since 2014, Japan’s progressive regulations for less harmful alternatives and health education initiatives have successfully reduced cigarette sales by 52%, addressing a leading cause of disease in many countries.
• Public Awareness Campaigns on Health Risks: Anti-tobacco campaigns that highlight health consequences have proven effective globally in reducing tobacco usage by influencing behavioural change.
  For example: Thailand’s graphic warning labels on tobacco packaging have raised awareness, resulting in reduced smoking rates.
• Restricting Access to Tobacco Products: Limiting access through regulated points of sale and age restrictions helps prevent youth from purchasing tobacco products.
  For example: Singapore restricts tobacco sales to licensed stores only, and it enforces strict age checks to prevent youth access.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Reducing Smoking Rates in the Country

• Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products: Many countries mandate plain packaging for tobacco products to reduce their appeal and discourage usage.
  For example: The Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, 2011 has reduced smoking rates, with studies indicating that plain packaging decreases brand appeal.
• Introducing Comprehensive Smoking Cessation Programs: Comprehensive cessation programs, including counselling and medical interventions, help individuals quit smoking.
  For example: Sweden’s progressive public health policies have supported alternatives like snus and nicotine pouches (NP), resulting in a 60% decrease in smoking rates, the biggest reduction of any EU country between 2006 and 2020.
• Community-Based Outreach and Education Programs: Local outreach programs that educate communities about the risks of smoking have been effective in rural and underserved areas.
  For instance: In the Philippines, community health workers are trained to raise awareness about tobacco harms, especially in rural areas.
• Enforcing Smoke-Free Public Spaces: Enforcing smoke-free zones reduces exposure to second-hand smoke and discourages smoking in public areas.
  For example: Ireland’s national ban on indoor smoking has led to a decline in smoking rates and reduced public health risks from passive smoke exposure.

The Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act (PECA) 2019 has shown promise in reducing youth access to e-cigarettes, but challenges persist in fully eliminating black market activities. To combat tobacco addiction and lower smoking rates, India can draw from global best practices, such as raising tobacco taxes, promoting smoking cessation programs, and enforcing smoke-free public spaces. By adopting a comprehensive approach that combines regulatory enforcement, public awareness, and support systems, India can make significant strides toward reducing the tobacco burden on public health.

DOWNLOAD PDF