Answer

Introduction

Article 164 states that the Chief Minister holds office during the Governor’s pleasure, but in a parliamentary democracy this pleasure is not personal discretion. It is constitutionally limited by majority support in the Legislative Assembly.

Body

Meaning of “Pleasure of Governor” under Article 164

• Constitutional Phrase: Article 164(1) states that the Chief Minister is appointed by the Governor and holds office during the Governor’s pleasure.
• Parliamentary Nature: India follows the Westminster model where the real executive is the elected Council of Ministers, not the Governor.
  Eg: The Constitution of India makes the Governor a constitutional head similar to the President.
• Not Personal Will: Governor cannot remove a Chief Minister based on personal dissatisfaction or political disagreement.
• Assembly Control: The pleasure doctrine survives only so long as the Chief Minister enjoys majority support in the House.
  Eg: Loss of majority—not Governor’s opinion—triggers constitutional removal.
• Constituent Intent: Constituent Assembly members warned against arbitrary gubernatorial discretion under Article 164.
  Eg: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar clarified that Governors would normally act on constitutional conventions, not personal whims.

Link with Confidence of Legislative Assembly

• Majority Principle: Chief Minister remains in office only while commanding confidence of the Legislative Assembly.
  Eg: Defeat in elections usually means the outgoing CM must resign if a new House supports another leader.
• Floor Test Rule: The correct method to test majority is on the Assembly floor, not Raj Bhavan assessments.
  Eg: In S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), the Supreme Court prioritised floor tests.
• Limited Discretion: Governor may ask for a floor test if majority is doubtful, but cannot dismiss without such proof.
  Eg: Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker (2016) restricted discretionary misuse by Governors.
• Post-Election Transition: Once the Assembly term expires and a new majority emerges, the outgoing ministry loses legitimacy.
  Eg: The Governor must invite the leader of the majority party to form the government.
• Judicial Review: Governor’s actions are not beyond scrutiny if exercised arbitrarily or mala fide.
  Eg: In Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974), the Court held Governors act on aid and advice except in limited situations.

Conclusion

The Governor’s pleasure under Article 164 is a constitutional formality, not an independent source of political power. Democratic legitimacy flows from Assembly confidence, ensuring that elected representatives and not gubernatorial discretion, determine who governs the State.

DOWNLOAD PDF