Answer

The NITI Aayog, established in 2015 as a successor to the Planning Commission, aims to strengthen cooperative federalism by promoting collaboration between the Centre and states. Through initiatives like the Aspirational Districts Programme and Atal Innovation Mission, it fosters innovation in policymaking. However, challenges like limited financial autonomy necessitate reforms to enhance its relevance and effectiveness in addressing India’s evolving policy landscape.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Positive Role of NITI Aayog in Strengthening Cooperative Federalism and Fostering Innovation

• Promoting Competitive Federalism: NITI Aayog introduced performance-based rankings (e.g., Aspirational Districts Programme) to encourage competition and improve governance among states.
  For example: Health Index Rankings helped states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu improve healthcare outcomes by adopting targeted policies.
• Facilitating Policy Coordination: NITI Aayog created platforms for dialogue between the Centre and states, fostering better coordination on critical issues.
  For example: Governing Council Meetings provided a forum to align state priorities with national development goals.
• Encouraging Data-Driven Policy: It developed indices to track progress in areas like health, education, and agriculture, enabling evidence-based policymaking.
  For example: The School Education Quality Index (SEQI) improved educational outcomes in many states including Haryana.
• Supporting State-Level Reforms: NITI Aayog provided strategic advice and technical assistance to states for reforming key sectors.
  For example: It supported Gujarat’s renewable energy transition with policy inputs on solar and wind energy.
• Driving Innovation through Public-Private Partnerships: By involving private players in policymaking, it introduced innovative solutions to policy challenges.
  For example: Collaboration with McKinsey for the Aspirational Districts Programme streamlined governance and execution.

Shortcomings of NITI Aayog in Strengthening Cooperative Federalism and Fostering Innovation

• Perceived Centralization: Its focus on rankings and indices led to criticisms of promoting central priorities over state-specific needs.
  For example: Aspirational Districts Programme was criticized for lacking state-specific customization in addressing disparities.
• Limited State Engagement: Despite its cooperative mandate, it failed to institutionalize robust mechanisms for Centre-state negotiation.
  For example: The absence of a budgetary role undermined its authority in facilitating fiscal coordination with states.
• Dependence on Private Sector: Excessive reliance on management consultants marginalized academics and civil society, limiting diverse perspectives in policymaking.
  For example: Use of consultants like BCG sidelined technical experts, raising concerns about independent analysis.
• Weak Strategic Visioning: Short-term action plans like India@75 lacked comprehensive policy frameworks, reducing their long-term impact.
  For example: The Three-Year Action Agenda (2017-2020) had limited influence on major policy decisions.
• Failure to Address Regional Disparities: NITI Aayog has not effectively tackled growing regional inequalities, weakening its cooperative federalism mandate.

Reforms to Ensure NITI Aayog’s Continued Relevance and Effectiveness in Addressing India’s Policy Challenges

• Grant Financial Powers for Strategic Planning: Empower NITI Aayog with financial resources to implement coherent medium- and long-term strategies to address key challenges like regional disparities.
  For example: Restoring budgetary powers, similar to the Planning Commission, can enable resource allocation to bridge gaps in underdeveloped states like Bihar and Odisha.
• Foster an Inclusive and Transparent Policymaking Framework: Institutionalize democratic dialogue with diverse stakeholders, including states, academics, and civil society, to enhance policy credibility and inclusiveness.
  For example: A structured mechanism for public consultations during India@100 strategic planning can ensure policies address grassroots concerns and foster acceptance.
• Promote Evidence-Based Policymaking: Develop a credible knowledge system by collaborating with universities, research institutions, and think tanks to provide data-driven and independent policy advice.
  For example: Partnerships with institutes like IISc Bengaluru for climate policy formulation could improve the rigor and applicability of policies.
• Strengthen Centre-State Bargaining Mechanisms: Create institutionalized mechanisms for inter-ministerial and Centre-State negotiations to address development issues and minimize regional imbalances.
  For example: A formalized Centre-State council under NITI Aayog can address richer states’ concerns about fiscal devolution, as raised in 13th Finance Commission debates.
• Enhance Autonomy and Reduce Centralization: Establish NITI Aayog as an independent body, limiting its susceptibility to Union government priorities, to make it a credible think tank for Team India.
  For example: Empowering state-level think tanks aligned with NITI Aayog’s agenda could enhance competitive federalism and allow decentralized policymaking.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

To ensure NITI Aayog’s continued relevance, India must focus on empowering states, fostering data-driven innovation, and promoting inclusive development. Strengthening decentralized planning, enhancing stakeholder collaboration, and aligning policies with global sustainability goals will enable NITI Aayog to drive transformative governance and address the evolving policy challenges of a dynamic India.

DOWNLOAD PDF